Kazakhstan: Access to HIV treatment in Kazakhstan for citizens and foreigner

In Kazakhstan, HIV treatment is officially free, the state provides patients with antiretroviral therapy (ART). But in practice, access to treatment depends on a person’s status: whether he has citizenship or a residence permit. Kursiv Lifestyle figured out how everything works and what to do in different situations.

How can citizens of Kazakhstan get ART:

  • First you take an HIV test. If the result is positive, you will be referred to an infectious disease specialist or a specialist of the center:
  • Next, you need to contact the AIDS center and report your result. The doctor conducts additional examinations and offers to register;
  • Registration is issued and you officially become a patient of the center;
  • After that, the doctor selects a treatment regimen. Antiretroviral drugs are given free of charge through the center, and the patient begins regular therapy.

Where to get tested for HIV for free and anonymously? You can take the test free of charge at the polyclinic by attachment or at the AIDS Center. Private medical centers also provide this service, but for a fee.

If complete anonymity is important, it is better to go to the AIDS Center or a private laboratory. In case of anonymous contact, no documents are required, you will be assigned a number known only to you.

Another anonymous way is to order a free express home test through the website hivtest.kz. This can be done today in 5 cities: Almaty, Astana, Karaganda, Ust-Kamenogorsk and Pavlodar.

Testing is included in the guaranteed amount of free medical care. This means that it can be passed even without registration or documents.

Where to register? To get therapy, you need to register at the AIDS center, they are in every major city. It is through this system that drugs are prescribed and issued.

This usually happens in the same institutions where testing is carried out – regional centers and polyclinics.

You can find out the address of the AIDS center in your city on the website of the Kazakh Scientific Center of Dermatology and Infectious Diseases.

What should I do if I don’t register in the system? The lack of registration complicates the process, but does not make it impossible. In any case, you can take the test for free and anonymously. Problems begin at the registration stage, as the system usually requires IIN or attachment to a polyclinic.

There are options: temporary attachment to the polyclinic or registration through the AIDS center itself. If there are refusals, it is recommended to apply again or to another center – decisions are often made individually.

What should foreigners do

The situation depends on the status of stay in the country. Foreigners with a residence permit (residence permit) have the same rights as citizens of Kazakhstan. They can get tested, register and receive therapy for free.

If there is no residence permit? If a person is in the country temporarily (under the RWP), he is entitled to free tests and consultations, but free ART is not guaranteed by law. But there is international donor funding and NGOs through which some people receive therapy or emergency support.

Then the person needs to contact the nearest AIDS Center as soon as possible and clarify whether it is possible to get into the donor program. The main source of such assistance is the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. As of December 9, 2025, 225 people living with HIV in Kazakhstan received ART at the expense of a Global Fund grant.

For help, you can contact NGOs and patient organizations. Community Friends work with HIV migrants in Almaty. They give pre-exposure therapy, put citizens from Central Asia on the remote registration, help and accompany to the AIDS center, where you can get treatment for foreign citizens, advise on adherence to ART, legal and social issues. In emergency cases, you can get a supply of ART for 1-2 months through them. For example, if a person is “stuck” in another country and cannot leave.

We managed to contact Oksana Ibragimova, a senior case manager of the Community friends. She confirmed the information about grants for ART and told about the program for citizens of neighboring countries.

“At the moment, non-citizens of Kazakhstan can apply to any AIDS center and receive therapy on a grant from the Global Fund. In addition, now we have a program for citizens of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan: they can send their tests to their homeland, they will be registered there and send medicines to Kazakhstan. Thus, the treatment is carried out at the expense of their native country,” says Ibragimova.

For HIV-positive travelers and migrants, Oksana recommended the website vputi.org, where you can find out information about the laws of different countries regarding HIV and access to therapy.

If a person has been denied treatment, there is a risk of interruption of therapy or problems with tests, you can leave an appeal on the Pereboi platform – you will need to fill out a small form on the website to contact the consultant, there are no contact numbers. You can also contact the Kazakhstan Union of People Living with HIV for advice and routing – the contact number and mail are in the “contacts” section of the website itself.

Important clarification: HIV status does not restrict entry into the country and does not prevent obtaining a residence permit, it was excluded from the list of diseases with which it is impossible to enter the country back in 2011.


Где гражданам и иностранцам с ВИЧ получить терапию в Казахстане 

В Казахстане лечение ВИЧ официально бесплатное, государство обеспечивает пациентов антиретровирусной терапией (АРТ). Но на практике доступ к лечению зависит от статуса человека: есть ли гражданство или вид на жительство. Kursiv Lifestyle разобрался, как все устроено и что делать в разных ситуациях.

Как гражданам Казахстана получить АРТ:

  • Сначала вы проходите тест на ВИЧ. Если результат положительный, вас направляют к инфекционисту или специалисту центра:
  • Далее нужно обратиться в СПИД-центр и сообщить о своем результате. Врач проводит дополнительные обследования и предлагает встать на учет;
  • Оформляется постановка на учет и вы официально становитесь пациентом центра;
  • После этого врач подбирает схему лечения. Антиретровирусные препараты выдают бесплатно через центр, и пациент начинает регулярную терапию.

Где пройти тест на ВИЧ бесплатно и анонимно? Сдать тест можно бесплатно в поликлинике по прикреплению или в СПИД-Центре. Частные медицинские центры тоже оказывают эту услугу, но платно.

Если важна полная анонимность, то лучше пойти в СПИД-Центр или частную лабораторию. При анонимном обращении документы не требуются, вам присвоят номер, известный только вам. 

Еще один анонимный способ — заказать бесплатный экспресс-тест на дом через сайтhivtest.kz. Сделать это можно на сегодня в 5 городах: Алматы, Астана, Караганда, Усть-Каменогорск и Павлодар.

Тестирование входит в гарантированный объем бесплатной медицинской помощи. Это означает, что его можно пройти даже без регистрации или документов.

Где встать на учет? Чтобы получить терапию, нужно встать на учет в СПИД-центре, они есть в каждом крупном городе. Именно через эту систему назначают и выдают препараты.

Обычно это происходит в тех же учреждениях, где проводится тестирование — региональных центрах и поликлиниках.

Узнать адрес центра СПИД в вашем городе можно на сайте Казахского научного центра дерматологии и инфекционных заболеваний

Что делать, если нет регистрации в системе? Отсутствие регистрации усложняет процесс, но не делает его невозможным. Пройти тест можно в любом случае бесплатно и анонимно. Проблемы начинаются на этапе постановки на учет, так как система обычно требует ИИН или прикрепление к поликлинике.

Возможны варианты: временное прикрепление к поликлинике или оформление через сам СПИД-центр. Если возникают отказы, рекомендуется обращаться повторно или в другой центр — решения часто принимаются индивидуально.

Что делать иностранцам

Ситуация зависит от статуса пребывания в стране. Иностранцы с видом на жительство (ВНЖ) имеют те же права, что и граждане Казахстана. Они могут пройти тестирование, встать на учет и получать терапию бесплатно.

Если ВНЖ нет? Если человек находится в стране временно (по РВП), ему полагаются бесплатные тесты и консультации, но бесплатная АРТ не гарантирована законом. Но есть международное донорское финансирование и НПО, через которые часть людей получает терапию или экстренную поддержку. 

Тогда человеку нужно как можно быстрее обратиться в ближайший Центр СПИД и уточнить, можно ли попасть в донорскую программу. Главный источник такой помощи — Глобальный фонд борьбы со СПИДом, туберкулезом и малярией. На 9 декабря 2025 года 225 людей, живущих с ВИЧ в Казахстане получали АРТ за счет средств гранта Глобального фонда.

За помощью можно обращаться в НПО и пациентские организации. В Алматы с мигрантами с ВИЧ работает Community Friends. Они дают доконтактную терапию, ставят на дистанционный учет граждан из Центральной Азии, помогают и сопровождаем в центр СПИД, где можно получить лечение для иностранных граждан консультируют по приверженности к АРТ, по правовым и социальным вопросам. В экстренных случаях через них можно получить запас АРТ на 1–2 месяца. Например, если человек «застрял» в другой стране и не может выехать.

Нам удалось связаться с Оксаной Ибрагимовой — старшим кейс менеджером ОФ Community friends. Она подтвердила информацию о грантах на АРТ и рассказала о программе для граждан соседних стран.

«На данный момент неграждане Казахстана могут обратиться в любой СПИД-центр, и по гранту Глобального фонда получить терапию. Кроме того, сейчас у нас действует программа для граждан Узбекистана, Таджикистана и Кыргызстана: они могут выслать свои анализы на Родину, там их поставят на учет и отправят лекарства уже в Казахстан. Таким образом лечение осуществляется за счет их родной страны», — говорит Ибрагимова.

Для ВИЧ-положительных путешественников и мигрантов Оксана порекомендовала сайт vputi.org, где можно узнать информацию о законах разных стран касательно ВИЧ и доступа к терапии.

Если человеку отказали в лечении, есть риск перерыва терапии или проблемы с анализами, можно оставить обращение на платформе Pereboi — нужно будет заполнить небольшую форму на сайте, чтобы связаться с консультантом, контактных номеров нет. Также за консультацией и маршрутизацией можно обращаться в Казахстанский союз людей, живущих с ВИЧ — контактный номер и почта есть в разделе «контакты» на самом сайте.

Важное уточнение: ВИЧ-статус не ограничивает въезд в страну и не мешает получить вид на жительство, его исключили из перечня заболеваний, с которыми нельзя въезжать в страну, еще в 2011.

Spain: Spanish officials warn of HIV treatment barriers for undocumented migrants

There are warnings that undocumented migrants in some autonomous communities are unable to access HIV treatment

Valladolid, 11 May (EFE). – The national director of the National AIDS Plan, Julia del Amo, has pointed out that around 50% of newly diagnosed HIV cases are among people born outside Spain, mostly from Latin America, and has warned that in some regions, particularly Madrid, undocumented migrants face barriers to accessing universal diagnosis and treatment.

Del Amo took part on Monday in Valladolid in the 22nd National Congress on AIDS and STIs, ‘HIV and +: health, equity and sexuality’, organised by the Spanish Interdisciplinary Society on AIDS (SEISIDA), and at a press conference she emphasised that although the virus no longer constitutes a public health emergency in Spain, ‘it remains a public health problem’.

Although the trend in Spain “is improving”, “we must be radical when it comes to infections; if we are not radical and leave pockets where the infection continues to spread, logically, if we do nothing, in five years’ time we will be much worse off than we are now”, warned Julia del Amo.

Currently, “a person who is being treated and has an undetectable viral load cannot transmit the infection”, hence the insistence that everyone should get tested and treated, although “there is a group of men from other countries, in some autonomous communities, who are not accessing universal diagnosis and treatment due to structural barriers within the healthcare system that prevent it”, said the director of the National AIDS Plan.

Data from 2024 show that around 3,300 new cases of HIV were diagnosed in Spain, half of them late-stage – another of the problems –; with 50 per cent born outside Spain, mainly in Latin America, followed by sub-Saharan Africa; with around 60 per cent of cases involving men who have sex with men, with an average age of 35.

The rate stands at 7 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, slightly above the European average, with 3.76 per 100,000 in the case of Castile and León, which recorded 90 new infections in 2024, with Burgos and Valladolid leading the way, although within the region’s low rate, Del Amo noted.

In this regard, one of the main groups at risk is currently the vulnerable population of migrants “who are being denied access due to these barriers within the healthcare system”, primarily in much of the Community of Madrid, but also elsewhere, including Castile and León, and where there is room for improvement, according to the director of the National AIDS Plan.

Julia del Amo emphasised that, nevertheless, there are extraordinary healthcare professionals and community networks of activists who ensure that treatment and diagnosis reach those who need them, albeit with a delay, and “during that delay there are transmissions that we could prevent”.

The president of SEISIDA and co-chair of the Congress, Pablo Ryan, a specialist in internal medicine at the Infanta Leonor University Hospital in Madrid, agreed with these issues regarding access for some migrants, who also lack information, and highlighted the role played by NGOs in facilitating access to treatment for this group, “filling those gaps in the system”.

HIV knows no borders, it knows no administrative barriers; it is a public health issue, both argued, and they recalled that the WHO’s target for 2030 is for 95% of people living with HIV to be diagnosed, for 95% of people living with HIV to be on treatment, and for 95% of those on treatment to be undetectable.

Based on data from 2021/2022, in Spain these targets stood at 92.5%, 97% and 90.5%, Del Amo noted.

In Spain, it is estimated that between 135,000 and 163,000 people are living with HIV; this is not just about a virus or a treatment, but about the conditions in which people live, about equity in treatment and access to testing, and about compassion and empathy, reflected Dr Pablo Ryan.

The rise in sexually transmitted infections was also addressed, which Nuria Espinosa, co-chair of the Congress and a specialist at the Infectious Diseases Unit at Virgen de Rocío in Seville, attributed, in part, to social changes in how people interact, with greater ease in having multiple partners and engaging in riskier sexual behaviour, and highlighted information and condom use as key factors.

Data on these infections show rates of 77 cases per 100,000 in 2024 for gonorrhoea, 24 per 100,000 for syphilis and 86 per 100,000 for chlamydia.


Alertan de que en algunas CCAA los migrantes sin papeles no acceden a tratamientos VIH

Valladolid, 11 may (EFE).- La directora nacional del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida, Julia del Amo, ha recordado que en torno al 50% de los nuevos casos diagnosticados de VIH son de personas nacidas fuera de España, mayoritariamente de América Latina, y ha alertado de que en algunas comunidades, en especial Madrid, los migrantes sin papeles se topan con barreras para acceder al diagnóstico y tratamiento universal.

Del Amo ha participado este lunes en Valladolid en el XXII Congreso Nacional sobre el Sida e ITS «VIH y +: salud, equidad y sexualidad», organizado por la Sociedad Española Interdisciplinaria del Sida (SEISIDA), y en rueda de prensa ha incidido en que aunque ese virus ya no supone problema de emergencia de salud pública en España, “sigue siendo un problema de salud pública”.

Aunque la tendencia en España “es a mejor”, en “las infecciones hay que ser radical y si no eres radical y dejas nichos donde esa infección se sigue transmitiendo, lógicamente si no hacemos nada en cinco años vamos a estar mucho peor de lo que estamos ahora”, ha alertado Julia del Amo.

Actualmente “una persona tratada, con carga viral indetectable, no puede transmitir la infección”, de ahí la insistencia en que todo el mundo se haga la prueba y se trate, aunque “hay un grupo de hombres de otros países, en algunas comunidades autónomas, que no están accediendo al diagnóstico y tratamiento universal por las barreras estructurales del sistema sanitario que lo impiden”, ha trasladado la directora del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida.

Los datos del 2024 recogen que en España se diagnosticaron unos 3.300 casos nuevos de VIH, la mitad tardíos -otro de los problemas-; con un 50 por ciento nacidos fuera de España, América Latina, fundamentalmente, seguida de África Subsahariana; con en torno al 60% de casos de hombres que tienen sexo con otros hombres, con 35 años de edad media.

La tasa es de 7 casos por 100.000 habitantes, un poco por encima de la media europea, con 3,76 por 100.000 en el caso de Castilla y León, que anotó 90 nuevas infecciones en 2024, con Burgos y Valladolid a la cabeza, aunque dentro de la baja tasa de la comunidad, ha referido Del Amo.

En ese sentido, uno de los principales nichos es actualmente esa población vulnerable de personas migrantes “a las que se les está negando el acceso por esas barreras del sistema sanitario”, fudamentalmente en buena parte de la comunidad de Madrid, pero también en el resto, incluida Castilla y León, y donde hay elementos mejorables, ha analizado la directora del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida.

Julia del Amo ha destacado que no obstante hay profesionales sanitarios extraordinarios y hay redes comunitarias de activistas que se aseguran que el tratamiento y el diagnóstico pueda llegar a las personas que los necesitan, pero con retraso, y “durante ese retraso hay transmisiones que podemos evitar”.

El presidente de SEISIDA y copresidente del Congreso, especialista en medicina interna del Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor de Madrid, Pablo Ryan, ha coincidido en esos problemas de acceso de algunos migrantes, que además carecen de información, y ha destacado el papel que tienen las ONG a la hora de facilitar el acceso a los tratamientos a ese colectivo, “tapando esos huecos del sistema”.

El VIH no entiende de fronteras, no entiende de barreras administrativas, son salud pública, han defendido ambos, y han recordado que el objetivo de la OMS para el 2030 es que el 95% de las personas que tienen VIH estén diagnosticadas, que el 95% de las personas con VIH estén en tratamiento y que el 95% de las personas que están en tratamiento, estén indetectables.

Con datos del 2021/2022, en España esos objetivos estaban en el 92,5, 97 y 90,5 por ciento, ha analizado Del Amo.

En España, se estima que entre 135.000 y 163.000 personas viven con VIH, que no es solo un virus o un tratamiento, sino de las condiciones en las que viven las personas, de equidad en los tratamientos y acceso a las pruebas, de cercanía y empatía, ha reflexionado el doctor Pablo Ryan.

También se ha abordado el aumento de las infecciones de transmisión sexual, que la copresidenta del Congreso y especialista de la Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas de Virgen de Rocío de Sevilla, Nuria Espinosa, ha atribuido, en parte, al cambio social a la hora de relacionarse, con facilidades para tener más parejas y más relaciones de riesgo, y la información y el uso del preservativo como elementos clave.

Los datos de esas infecciones dejan tasas de 77 casos por 100.000 en 2024 en gonorrea, con 24 por 100.000 en sífilis y 86 por 100.000 en clamidea.

Latin America: Access to HIV Care for migrants hindered by exclusionary policies

Migration and HIV: challenges to overcome barriers

Economic and political setbacks hinder access to public health services for the HIV-positive migrant population. .

“In many countries, access to HIV prevention and treatment services for trans women is impossible due to their immigration status, and this widens the health gap Latin American and Caribbean Network of Trans Women , speaking on the UNAIDS podcast Latin American Dialogues: Intersectionality in the HIV Response.”The network is an organization dedicated to defending the human rights of trans women, sex workers, and trans people in situations of human mobility and migration in Latin America and the Caribbean.

What Vidal says is a summary of the times. According to the UNAIDS program, it is estimated that between 30,000 and 40,000 people in transit in the region are living with HIV. The unprecedented social and economic crisis on the continent has generated the largest flow of refugees and migrants in history. In addition to their immigration status, they face high levels of stigma, xenophobia, and racism, and limited access to healthcare.

“We’ve had to receive colleagues who come with a diagnosis, a month of antiretroviral treatment, and when it ends, we practically have to force the health authorities to support us,” Vidal continues. “And what often happens is that because they don’t have identification, they can’t access treatment so easily. Sometimes adherence is lost because we’re talking about a month, a month and a half of waiting for treatment.”.

What’s missing

Bureaucracy, especially the requirement of identity documents in the health systems of host countries, acts as a tool of exclusion that prevents access to antiretroviral therapies and viral suppression controls.

The activists consulted for this article agree: the impact of HIV on people on the move is often exacerbated by institutional mistreatment, abandonment by families, and lack of support during transit, weakening their health . But they warn, “the response to HIV is weak for the entire population. It is not exclusive to the migrant population .

Deaths from advanced infection continue to be recorded in the region, where health systems are already strained. Barriers to accessing comprehensive and sustainable care exist. There is a lack of prevention models and medication shortages. All of this contributes to the virus not being detected in time.

Setbacks in the region

Countries like Costa Rica and Argentina, which historically led the LGBT+ rights agenda, are showing signs of regression in public policy. In Costa Rica, the withdrawal of the OAS LGBT working group and the halting of sexuality protocols in schools demonstrate this setback. Despite the existence of protective laws, their lack of regulation and a climate of discrimination persist. For example, a gender identity law is still lacking, and the restrictions faced by people with HIV, despite existing laws, do not fully protect them .

In Argentina, the National Front Against HIV, Hepatitis, and Tuberculosis reported a 76% reduction in funding allocated to HIV, hepatitis, tuberculosis, and STIs. The national government transferred the responsibility for purchasing antiretroviral drugs to the provinces without providing the necessary resources or logistical support, leading to medication shortages.

“The Milei government has cut the health budget specifically for everything related to HIV prevention and treatment. There are zero prevention campaigns and zero treatment campaigns. And shortages have begun. Before, the national government provided the medication to the different districts; now, the provision has become the responsibility of each district. Sometimes, districts find that these medications weren’t included in their budget allocations or that they lack the logistical capacity to purchase them; so they run out,” explains Mariano Ruiz, executive director of Human Rights and Diversity .

She adds: “The refugees we receive are mostly Russians or people from countries that were part of the Soviet bloc. The main reason they come to us is because they ran out of HIV medication . We help them by providing guidance before they arrive in the country because they are planning their departure from Russia, where life there is unsustainable. We ask them to find out their HIV status and to start treatment if they are positive. For these refugees, the biggest challenge in accessing healthcare is the language barrier,” she explains.

Barriers to access to health

The dismantling of public systems affects the migrant population. 27% of those seeking treatment arrive in an advanced stage of HIV . Furthermore, those in an irregular situation are 70% less likely to achieve viral suppression, according to UNAIDS data

In Mexico, the transition to the IMSS-Bienestar model (a program to provide free medical care to people without social security) has created administrative barriers that violate the right to life of both migrants and internally displaced persons. The requirement of the CURP (a national identification document) is the main obstacle to accessing medications at CAPASITS (Outpatient Centers for the Prevention and Care of AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections, which are free, specialized health units in Mexico).

Brigitte Baltazar Lujano, coordinator of the LGBTQ+ community program at the organization Al Otro Lado in Tijuana, points out the seriousness of these omissions.

“It’s not only the external migrant population that is suffering these devastating effects. The involuntary migrant community, internally displaced persons, are also affected. Recently, there have been many changes in how the government handles health issues. It is more difficult for internally displaced persons to access their HIV medication. For people from other countries, it is twice as difficult to access these medications. This represents a very serious lack of attention from our country in this sector. The right to access medication or any other type of medical care that any human being may have is being violated.”

PrEP is not guaranteed for migrant populations

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a vital prevention tool for migrant populations. However, access to PrEP and emergency post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is limited by bureaucratic barriers and discrimination.

In Tijuana, access for migrants is practically nonexistent because the medication is strictly controlled by the Ambulatory Centers for the Prevention and Care of AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections (CAPASITS), and identification is required to obtain it, explains Brigitte Baltazar. This same requirement for identification exists in Costa Rica.

“If a migrant arrives after being sexually abused, the health system’s response is usually, ‘Wait three months, get tested, and if you test positive, then we’ll start antiretroviral medication.’ This adds to all the bureaucracy involved in starting treatment. In other words, there is no emergency PEP available for undocumented people, and that leaves them at absolute risk ,” Brigitte explains.

In Argentina, the situation is similar for both asylum seekers and Argentinians seeking emergency medication. “The main obstacle for asylum seekers is the language barrier. Then there are all the same challenges faced by Argentinians: the lack of medication, and sometimes refusal from healthcare staff who are trying to conserve resources. It’s left to the doctor’s discretion whether they consider the person seeking it to have risky behaviors, even though, according to legislation, PrEP is a prevention strategy available only at the person’s request,” explains Mariano Ruiz.

Lack of funding and anti-immigrant policies

The region is also facing cuts in international cooperation. The withdrawal of funding from USAID , the Global Fund, and the closure of UNAIDS offices have left civil society organizations working on HIV, migration, LGBT+ rights, and other issues in a precarious situation.

“I find it so irresponsible and also very perverse that these cuts are eliminating programs when we know they did produce results and did save lives. This continues to be alarming and worrying,” says Dennis Castillo, executive director of the Institute on LGBT Migration and Refugees for Central America (IRCA Casabierta), an organization based in San José, Costa Rica.

Adding to the financial hardship are anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies. Mario Campos explains that migrants living with HIV in the United States fear deportation when seeking healthcare, and that is reason enough not to seek medical attention.

In everyday life, the stigma also manifests itself in the mistreatment by administrative and security staff in hospitals, even before they receive care. “From the moment migrants arrive at the hospital, it’s the security guard who asks which department they’re going to or their medical condition. People already feel uncomfortable and vulnerable. Once, someone told me that the guard said, ‘That’s why you have to be careful, that’s why you shouldn’t be having reckless sex.’ The stigma and discrimination that migrants suffer is serious, but if you add living with HIV, it’s extremely serious ,” says Brigitte Baltazar from Tijuana.

The community response in Mexico, Costa Rica, Argentina and the United States

Faced with the abandonment by States, grassroots organizations and independent activists have assumed the responsibility of guaranteeing services that governments omit, such as prevention campaigns, screening tests and the supply of medication.

In Mexico, the organization Al Otro Lado combats the exclusion caused by the CURP requirement by providing legal support and a physical presence in hospitals to ensure that migrants and internally displaced persons living with HIV can access services and are not discriminated against. They also manage online registrations, provide transportation, and have established partnerships with the AHF Healthcare Foundationto obtain emergency doses of medication when the government denies them.

“The Mexican State must provide what is rightfully theirs, which is access to healthcare for all people. It is a historical debt that the government owes to the migrant population to receive them and provide them with the services they are legally entitled to,” Brigitte Baltazar reiterates.

In Costa Rica, IRCA Casabierta offers a comprehensive approach that includes legal and psychological assistance, a food bank, and a computer lab for the digital regularization of migrants. Faced with cuts in international funding, the organization manages state resources to purchase preventative supplies that the health system does not provide to uninsured individuals. Dennis Castillo, executive director of IRCA Casabierta, denounces the Costa Rican government for abandoning prevention efforts, delegating this task to civil society.

In Argentina, the organization Human Rights and Diversity runs an integration center for LGBTQ+ refugees, most of whom come from Russia, Belarus, and Georgia. Due to a lack of government support to overcome administrative and language barriers, they use “social interpreters”—former beneficiaries who speak the language—to accompany patients to their medical appointments.

Activist Mario Campos connects people on the move with free clinics in Mexico, the United States, Canada, and Spain. His work focuses on combating the knowledge gap caused by the lack of comprehensive sex education, especially among migrants from Central American countries, primarily Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras. Mario believes that misinformation and the lack of comprehensive sex education are critical barriers that increase the vulnerability of people living with HIV.

US: Idaho push to identify immigration status of HIV patients sparks alarm

Idaho lawmakers seek immigration status of HIV patients using state resources

The Department of Health and Welfare would be required to report the immigration status of people using state HIV prevention services under a proposed public health budget.

The move comes after Idaho lawmakers in 2025 passed a measure to prevent some immigrants from accessing services such as soup kitchens, prenatal care and crisis counseling.

Just days before that law was set to take effect, the American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho announced a lawsuit against part of the law that would prevent some immigrants from accessing HIV medication.

The plaintiffs argued that the immigrants couldn’t receive the medication otherwise, and the people needing those meds could face severe health issues or even death, while Idaho risked an HIV spread. A judge agreed and blocked that portion of the law from going into effect while litigation is ongoing.

On Tuesday, during a meeting of the state’s powerful budget committee, lawmakers voted 14-4 to include the immigration report language in a Health and Welfare budget.

The budget committee’s co-chair, Rep. Josh Tanner, R-Eagle, told the Idaho Statesman that someone in DHW told him that there was an increase in HIV among undocumented immigrants. He said he would not share the source.

The report was important to help the state figure out how to get ahead of any increases, he said.

“It’s important to understand,” Tanner said.

AJ McWhorter, a spokesperson with the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, said there hasn’t been a trend in HIV cases for the past five years, but there have been regional increases “here and there.”

HIV cases have increased in the eastern and southeastern parts of the state in 2026, according to East Idaho News, with seven cases diagnosed in the first three months of the year — matching the typical yearly average.

The number of cases in that part of the state was “unexpected,” McWhorter said.

“As for what is causing the increase in Eastern and Southeastern Idaho, we don’t see a single determining factor,” McWhorter wrote in an email. “Increases can occur due to changes in testing patterns, partner networks, or a variety of other community factors.”

During Monday’s meeting, Tanner refused to let Sen. Melissa Wintrow, D-Boise, talk about the motion, instead repeatedly calling for a vote to be taken. But she managed to slip a word in:

“I need to say I think it’s really important that we are not discriminating against people based on a disease and an infection,” Wintrow said. “Disease knows no immigration status.”

New WHO report shows encouraging gains in migrant health inclusion, but gaps persist

Encouraging progress in inclusive health policies for refugees and migrants

The World Health Organization (WHO) reports a major shift in how countries are responding to the health needs of refugees and migrants, with new data showing more than 60 countries – two thirds of those surveyed – now include them in their national health policies and laws.

Drawing on data from 93 Member States, the report establishes the first global baseline for tracking progress toward inclusive, migrant-responsive health systems.

Human migration is a defining feature of our shared history, driving cultural, social and economic developments across generations. Today, over 1 billion people – over 1 in 8 globally – live as refugees or migrants.

Reasons for moving range from conflict and disasters, to economic opportunity, education or family needs. Yet many refugees and migrants face barriers to accessing care, heightened risks of infectious and chronic diseases, mental-health challenges, and unsafe living or working conditions.

“Refugees and migrants are not just recipients of care, they are also health workers, caregivers and community leaders,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General, World Health Organization. “Health systems are only truly universal when they serve everyone. WHO’s new report on the health of migrants and refugee shows that inclusion benefits whole societies and strengthens preparedness for future health challenges.”

Investment in refugee and migrant health deliver far-reaching dividends. They support better social and economic integration, strengthen the resilience of health systems and reinforce global health security. Inclusive, migrant-responsive health systems also reduce long-term costs by enabling healthy, well-integrated populations to contribute fully to the societies in which they live.

The new “World report on promoting the health of refugees and migrants: monitoring progress on the WHO global action plan” shows that even in politically sensitive contexts, countries are increasingly relying on evidence, data, science, and established norms and standards to guide how migration and health are addressed within national health systems.

Case studies from all six WHO regions illustrate how progress can be achieved in practice – from expanded migrant health insurance coverage in Thailand, to the use of cross-cultural communication mediators in Belgium, and the inclusion of migrant community representatives in decision-making on primary health care delivery in Chile.

Gaps remain

Despite progress, the report highlights persisting gaps:

  • only 37% of responding countries routinely collect, analyze and disseminate migration-related health data as part of national health information systems;
  • just 42% include refugees and migrants in emergency preparedness, disaster risk reduction or response plans;
  • fewer than 40% report training health workers in culturally responsive care for refugees and migrants;
  • only 30% have implemented communication campaigns to counter misperceptions and discrimination related to refugee and migrant health;
  • access remains uneven: while refugees are generally more likely to access health services, migrants in irregular situations, internally displaced persons, migrant workers, and international students are far less consistently covered; and
  • participation in governance is limited: refugees and migrants remain under-represented in health governance and decision-making processes in most countries.

The way forward

WHO welcomes the progress made and urges governments, partners and donors to accelerate progress by:

  • embedding refugees and migrants in all national health policies, strategies and plans;
  • strengthening the collection and use of routine, disaggregated migration health data for planning and accountability;
  • coordinating across sectors spanning health, housing, education, employment and social protection;
  • tailoring strategies to the specific needs of different migrant subgroups, including those in irregular situations;
  • meaningfully engaging refugees and migrants in planning, governance and service design and delivery;
  • training health workers on providing equitable, culturally-sensitive care;
  • tackling misinformation and discrimination through evidence-informed action; and
  • protecting and expanding financing to safeguard progress for all.

WHO will continue to support Member States to translate commitments into action, by strengthening evidence, promoting culturally responsive care and integrating refugees and migrants into resilient national health systems. At global, regional and country levels, WHO will also continue working closely with partners, including the International Organization for Migration, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the World Bank to advance coordinated, rights-based approaches to refugee and migrant health.

The IOM became the first international organization to onboard onto the Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN), a WHO-hosted digital public infrastructure that enables the verification of health documents across countries. The new collaboration is expected to further enhance efforts to help migrants securely access verifiable health records wherever they go, supporting continuity of care across borders.

By becoming the first international organization to join the GDHCN, IOM underscores WHO’s leadership in leading the public health aspects of refugee and migrant health and in fostering trusted, interoperable digital health systems that protect and empower people globally.

Canada: Petition urges Canadians to oppose moves to restrict refugee health coverage

Media Briefing Note: Conservative motion and Liberal changes to refugee health care – Fact Check and Context

THE SITUATION IN BRIEF

The Conservative Party of Canada has tabled a motion today to drastically restrict health care coverage for asylum seekers under the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP). Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre released a video yesterday making a series of claims about the program that are factually incorrect or misleading.

Importantly: the Liberal government has already introduced cuts to the same program. Starting May 1, 2026, refugees will be forced to pay out-of-pocket co-payments for medications, dental care, mental health counseling, and vision care. The Conservative motion would go further – stripping nearly all non-emergency coverage entirely.

Both developments require scrutiny.

Click here to sign a petition against cuts to refugee healthcare. 

QUOTE

“The people being targeted by these cuts survived war, torture, and persecution. They came to Canada because we told the world we were a country that offered refuge. Now both political parties are competing to see who can take more away from them – and they are doing it by lying to Canadians. The IFHP is not out of control. Refugees are not the reason you can’t find a family doctor and stripping sick people of basic medications will not reduce your wait time by a single day. We are asking Canadians: don’t let politicians use vulnerable people as a punching bag to score points. Learn the facts. Reject the division. Speak up for refugee healthcare.” – Syed Hussan, Spokesperson, Migrant Rights Network

CLAIM-BY-CLAIM FACT CHECK

(1) CLAIM: “Cutting refugee health care saves money”
VERDICT: False — Liberal co-payments policy shift costs to the most expensive part of the system

The government still covers 100% of emergency visits. When a refugee cannot afford a $4 insulin prescription and ends up in the ICU for diabetic ketoacidosis, that hospitalization costs an average of $7,826. When untreated hypertension leads to a stroke, costs run into the tens of thousands — all downloaded onto provincial systems.

The evidence is unambiguous: multiple peer-reviewed studies, including a randomized controlled trial that found removing a small $5 co-payment reduced hospitalizations by over 60% for chronic disease patients, confirm that co-payments cause low-income patients to forgo medications and end up in emergency rooms. A Canadian study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis found that during co-payment periods, hospital admissions rose while prescription fills fell. TheCollege of Family Physicians of Canada warns the $4 fee will result in deferred care and worse outcomes. Co-payments do not reduce costs — they move them.

(2) CLAIM: “The IFHP costs over a billion dollars and has grown 1,000%”
VERDICT: Misleading and partly false

The IFHP costs a fraction of what Canadians cost the healthcare system. The IFHP represents approximately 0.2% of Canada’s total health spending of $399 billion. Put another way, Canada spends $9,626 a year on healthcare per Canadian, versus just $1,645 a year per refugee claimant. The “1,000%” growth claim is simply false: costs grew from $211 million in 2020–21 to $896 million in 2024–25 — an increase of approximately 325%, not 1,000%. Costs grew because asylum claim volumes increased and processing backlogs extended the amount of time claimants had to wait for a decision on their case – not because benefits expanded. Asylum claim referrals have already dropped over 43% from 2024 to 2025 — from 190,483 to 108,060. The Parliamentary Budget Officer projects annual cost growth of the IFHP will slow from 33.7% to 11.2% going forward – without any cuts to coverage.

(3) CLAIM: “The IFHP provides deluxe benefits that Canadians don’t get”
VERDICT: False

IRCC’s own program description states IFHP supplemental coverage is comparable to benefits available to low-income Canadians on provincial social assistance — the same level of dental, vision, and prescription coverage as someone on Ontario Works. The claim that asylum seekers receive better care than Canadians lacks any defined comparator and is contradicted by IRCC’s program design. Canada recently launched a national dental care plan precisely because gaps in supplemental coverage hurt low-income Canadians – the answer to that gap is expanding access, not stripping it from refugees.

(4) CLAIM: “Money is being diverted from Canadian health care to refugees”
VERDICT: False

The IFHP is federally funded and entirely separate from provincial health budgets. Cutting it does not free up a single dollar for family doctors or specialist care. What it does do is shift costs — when refugees forgo preventive care and end up in emergency rooms, those costs download onto the very provincial health systems the Conservatives claim to be protecting.

(5) CLAIM: “6 million Canadians can’t find a family doctor because of asylum seekers”
VERDICT: False – causation not established

The OurCare Survey 2025, conducted by St. Michael’s Hospital in partnership with the Canadian Medical Association, found 5.9 million Canadians lack access to a regular primary care provider – but asylum seekers are not the cause. The Canadian Medical Association has documented a deficit of 22,823 family physicians driven by decades of underfunding and inadequate workforce planning. The IFHP is a separate federal program with no connection to provincial budgets that fund family doctors. Asylum seekers make up less than 1% of Canada’s population. Cutting their health care will not free up a single spot on a patient waitlist.

(6) CLAIM: “It takes 30 weeks for the average Canadian to see a specialist”
VERDICT: Mischaracterized metric

The widely cited figure measures median wait time from GP referral all the way to treatment completion — not time to see a specialist. The most recent data puts this figure at 28.6 weeks for 2025. More importantly, this has no relationship whatsoever to refugee health coverage. The IFHP is federally funded and is entirely separate from provincial health budgets. Cutting it will not reduce wait times by a single day.

(7) CLAIM: “Most asylum claimants are bogus”
VERDICT: False

In 2025, 63% of finalized refugee claims were accepted by Canada’s own legal system. Nearly a third of appeals at the Refugee Appeal Division are granted — meaning the system itself regularly finds that initial rejections were wrong.

(8) CLAIM: “Rejected claimants unfairly continue receiving benefits”
VERDICT: Misleading

Rejected claimants remain covered only while exhausting their legal right to appeal – a right that exists because the system makes errors that require correction, as evidenced by the high number of appeals that are successful. There are currently approximately 300,000 pending claims before the IRB. Both the PBO and IRCC identify this backlog as a primary cost driver. The solution is faster, fairer processing – not stripping health care while people wait increasingly longer to get a decision.

(9) CLAIM: “Asylum seekers have never paid taxes”
VERDICT: False

Asylum seekers have work permits and those that work pay income tax, HST, and payroll deductions – the same as any Canadian worker. All refugee claimants pay HST on every purchase.

(10) ON THE PROVIDER BILLING CLAIM

Some Conservative messaging has claimed providers charge up to five times provincial rates under the IFHP. This claim is disputed in Parliamentary committee testimony – IRCC officials state the IFHP uses fee schedules aligned with provincial rates. Where billing irregularities exist, the appropriate response is targeted audits of those providing care, not punishing the people receiving care.

(11) CUTS WILL COST MORE, NOT LESS

Creating financial barriers to treatment for communicable diseases — including tuberculosis, HIV, and hepatitis — poses risks beyond refugee communities. As the HIV Legal Network and HIV & AIDS Legal Clinic Ontario have warned, reduced treatment uptake increases transmission and the likelihood of outbreaks, undermining public health for all Canadians.

(12) THE LEGAL PRECEDENT

In 2012, the Harper government made similar cuts to the IFHP. A peer-reviewed study documented increased emergency room costs as hospitals absorbed care that had been withdrawn. The Federal Court struck the cuts down as “cruel and unusual treatment” — a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The cuts were reversed. The current co-payment policy faces the same constitutional vulnerability.

India: Kerala Health Authorities plan large-scale HIV awareness drive and medical camp

Campaign to address health concerns among migrant workers

A recent spike in reported HIV cases in and around Perumbavoor in Ernakulam district has drawn renewed attention to healthcare challenges among migrant workers. As many as 15 people tested HIV-positive in the area over the past few months.

While the workers who tested HIV-positive are currently undergoing treatment, the emergence of these cases has highlighted the urgent need to address broader healthcare gaps within the migrant community.

In an effort to address the emerging concerns, the Health department, along with the Kerala State AIDS Control Society (KSACS), is jointly organising a mega awareness programme and medical camp on February 22, 2026.

The day will also mark the launch of Niramaya Pravas 2026, a campaign spearheaded by the KSACS in collaboration with various government departments. The initiative focuses on promoting the overall health and well-being of migrant workers across the State.

According to Reshmi Madhavan, joint director, KSACS, health challenges continue to remain a matter of concern among the migrant community. “It is observed that their priority is employment. Health figures as an area of least priority. We need to bring them into the ambit of healthcare with due diligence,” Ms. Madhavan said. According to her, the focus should be on empowering the community to seek medical help when faced with an illness, be it a sexually transmitted disease or any other disease.

“The focus is on creating awareness among the community, getting them medical help and preventing the spread of diseases. Hence, we are planning intensive campaigns across the State targeting the community,” said Ms. Madhavan.

One of the main challenges faced by the department is keeping track of members of the migrant community, officials said. “It has been observed that their focus is on staying employed. So even when diagnosed with a disease, they do not return for follow-up treatment. When we try to track them, they would have moved to other locations for work. The absence of proper registers and documentation is proving to be a challenge,” said Dr. Rosamma P.S., Medical Superintendent, Government Taluk Hospital, Perumbavoor.

Perumbavoor municipal chairperson K.N. Sangeetha said that regular medical camps would also be held to address the healthcare challenges of the region.

Displaced populations face unique health challenges and barriers

Refugee and Migrant Health: Protecting Vulnerable People on the Move

Amina fled Syria in 2015 with her three children after bombs destroyed their neighborhood in Aleppo. The harrowing journey to Europe took three months—traveling by foot, crowded trucks, and a dangerous boat crossing where several fellow passengers drowned. When her family finally reached a refugee camp in Greece, Amina thought their ordeal was over. Instead, new health challenges began. Her youngest daughter developed chronic diarrhea from contaminated water in the overcrowded camp. Her son’s asthma worsened from sleeping in a cold, damp tent with no medication available. Amina herself struggled with severe depression and anxiety from trauma, displacement, and uncertainty about their future. Healthcare at the camp was overwhelmed—one doctor for 5,000 refugees, minimal medicines, no mental health services, and no treatment for chronic diseases.

Amina’s family represents a fraction of the approximately 100 million forcibly displaced people worldwide—the highest number ever recorded. This includes refugees fleeing persecution, conflict, or violence, internally displaced persons forced from homes but remaining within their countries, asylum seekers awaiting refugee status determination, and stateless persons without nationality from any country. Beyond forcibly displaced populations, an additional 280 million international migrants live outside their birth countries for economic opportunities, family reunification, education, or other reasons.

According to the World Health Organization, refugees and migrants often face particular health challenges and barriers to accessing healthcare. While refugees and migrants are not inherently less healthy than host populations—many are young, healthy individuals—the circumstances surrounding migration can create health vulnerabilities. WHO emphasizes that ensuring refugees’ and migrants’ health is important not only for their wellbeing but also for public health and social cohesion in host communities. Health challenges include infectious disease risks from overcrowding in camps, inadequate water and sanitation, interrupted vaccination schedules, and limited access to treatment; noncommunicable disease management disrupted by displacement; maternal and child health vulnerabilities; mental health problems from trauma, violence, loss, and ongoing uncertainty; and injuries from dangerous journeys and violence.

Understanding Refugee and Migrant Populations

Refugees and migrants comprise diverse populations with different legal statuses and health needs. Refugees are people fleeing persecution, conflict, violence, or human rights violations who have crossed international borders and cannot return safely. They’re protected under international law with specific rights including access to healthcare. The global refugee crisis has escalated dramatically—in 2023, over 36 million people were refugees, the highest number recorded. Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Myanmar, and Ukraine produce the largest refugee populations.

Internally displaced persons (IDPs) are forced from homes by conflict, violence, disasters, or persecution but remain within their countries’ borders. They number approximately 62 million globally, often facing similar health challenges as refugees but lacking international protection. Asylum seekers are people who have applied for refugee status and await decisions. During this period, they face legal uncertainties affecting healthcare access. Migrants broadly include anyone moving across borders temporarily or permanently for work, education, family reunification, or better opportunities. While migration can be voluntary, many “economic migrants” face desperate circumstances including poverty, climate change impacts, and limited opportunities pushing them to seek better lives elsewhere.

Like maternal health and newborn health requiring specialized approaches for vulnerable populations, refugee and migrant health demands understanding unique circumstances and needs.

Health Challenges During Migration

The migration journey itself creates significant health risks. Dangerous travel routes including desert crossings causing dehydration and heat exposure, sea crossings on overcrowded, unseaworthy boats risking drowning, walking long distances causing injuries and exhaustion, and traveling in crowded, poorly ventilated vehicles spreading infectious diseases all threaten health. Many migrants face violence during journeys including robbery, assault, sexual violence (particularly affecting women and children), trafficking and exploitation, and violence from smugglers or border enforcement.

Environmental exposures harm health through extreme temperatures without adequate shelter or clothing, inadequate food and water causing malnutrition and dehydration, and exposure to disease vectors like mosquitoes in areas with malaria or other diseases. Interrupted healthcare causes medication disruptions for people with chronic diseases like diabetes, hypertension, or HIV losing access to essential medications, missed vaccinations leaving children vulnerable to preventable diseases, and lack of prenatal care for pregnant women risking complications.

Mental health impacts include trauma from violence, loss of family members, and witnessing atrocities, chronic stress from ongoing uncertainty and danger, grief and loss of homes, communities, and familiar lives, and fear about future prospects and family safety. These psychological impacts can manifest as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other mental health conditions requiring treatment often unavailable during migration.

Health Risks in Camps and Settlements

Refugee camps and settlements, while providing temporary safety, often create new health challenges. Overcrowding with thousands living in cramped conditions facilitates infectious disease transmission including respiratory infections like pneumonia and tuberculosis spreading rapidly in crowded shelters, diarrheal diseases from inadequate sanitation, and vaccine-preventable diseases like measles and pertussis causing outbreaks in undervaccinated populations.

Inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) creates disease risks through contaminated water sources causing cholera, typhoid, and diarrheal diseases, insufficient sanitation facilities spreading fecal-oral diseases, and limited hygiene supplies preventing proper handwashing and menstrual hygiene. Food insecurity and malnutrition result from insufficient food rations causing undernutrition, monotonous diets lacking essential nutrients causing micronutrient deficiencies, and distribution challenges preventing fair access.

Limited healthcare services mean overburdened health facilities cannot meet population needs, insufficient health workers to provide adequate care, medication shortages particularly for chronic diseases, and minimal specialized services like mental health care, chronic disease management, or surgical capacity. Inadequate shelter through tents or temporary structures providing insufficient protection from weather, lack of heating in cold climates, poor ventilation facilitating disease transmission, and fire risks from cooking and heating in crowded conditions all compromise health.

Violence and safety concerns include gender-based violence affecting women and girls, child protection issues including family separation and exploitation, and insecurity within camps from conflicts or criminal activity. Like challenges in occupational health, refugee camp health risks require systematic environmental improvements.

Barriers to Healthcare Access

Even when healthcare services exist in host countries, refugees and migrants face multiple access barriers. Legal and administrative obstacles include unclear legal status affecting healthcare entitlements, documentation requirements that refugees/migrants cannot meet, and administrative complexity navigating unfamiliar health systems. Financial barriers involve lack of health insurance or ineligibility for public coverage, inability to afford out-of-pocket healthcare costs, and poverty limiting ability to pay for medicines or transportation to facilities.

Language and cultural barriers mean inability to communicate with healthcare providers, unfamiliarity with host country health systems and how to access care, cultural differences in understanding illness and treatment, and mistrust of authorities stemming from past persecution or negative experiences. Geographic barriers include living in remote areas far from health facilities, lack of transportation to reach healthcare services, and settlement in areas with inadequate health infrastructure.

Discrimination and xenophobia create hostile environments through stigma and discrimination against refugees/migrants in healthcare settings, fear of deportation preventing care-seeking, and racism affecting quality of care received. Knowledge gaps result from limited information about available health services, unawareness of rights to healthcare, and lack of health education in languages refugees/migrants understand.

Like primary health care access gaps generally, refugee and migrant healthcare barriers require systematic solutions addressing multiple levels.

Health Interventions and Solutions

Addressing refugee and migrant health requires comprehensive approaches. Emergency health services in camps and settlements should provide basic healthcare through primary care facilities, emergency treatment, and mobile clinics reaching remote populations. Essential interventions include immunization campaigns preventing outbreaks, nutritional support addressing malnutrition, maternal and child health services, and infectious disease surveillance and control.

WASH improvements ensure safe water supply, adequate sanitation facilities, hygiene promotion and supplies, and environmental sanitation reducing disease transmission. Mental health and psychosocial support through counseling services, psychological first aid training for healthcare workers and community members, support groups for trauma survivors, and culturally appropriate mental health interventions address psychological needs.

Healthcare access in host countries requires inclusive health policies ensuring refugees/migrants can access essential healthcare, affordable or subsidized healthcare reducing financial barriers, language services through interpreters and translated materials, and culturally competent care respecting diverse backgrounds. Health system strengthening involves increasing capacity to serve refugee/migrant populations, training healthcare workers in refugee health and cultural competency, integrating refugee/migrant health into national health systems, and ensuring continuity of care for chronic diseases.

Community engagement empowers refugee/migrant communities through participatory approaches in health program design, community health workers from refugee/migrant communities providing culturally appropriate care, health education in relevant languages addressing specific needs, and addressing social determinants of health including housing, education, and employment. Like One Health requiring cross-sectoral collaboration, refugee health demands coordinated humanitarian and development responses.

Amina’s Progress

Five years after arriving in Greece, Amina’s family resettled in Germany through a refugee resettlement program. Access to comprehensive healthcare transformed their lives. Her daughter’s chronic diarrhea was properly diagnosed and treated. Her son received asthma medications and an inhaler, controlling his symptoms. Amina received mental health counseling and treatment for depression and PTSD. The family enrolled in German language classes and health education programs teaching them to navigate the healthcare system.

“Having access to healthcare made us feel human again,” Amina reflects. “In the camp, we were just surviving day to day, dealing with illness after illness without proper treatment. Here, we can see doctors when we’re sick, get medications we need, and address our mental health. My children can grow up healthy. This should be available to all refugees—healthcare is a human right, not a privilege.”

Dr. Hassan, who provides healthcare to refugee populations, emphasizes: “Refugees and migrants face extraordinary health challenges from dangerous journeys, trauma, displacement, crowded camps, and barriers accessing care. Yet with appropriate support, they’re resilient populations who recover, contribute to host societies, and thrive. Ensuring refugee and migrant health requires recognizing healthcare as a human right, providing emergency health services in camps and during transit, including refugees and migrants in national health systems, addressing social determinants like housing and employment, combating discrimination and xenophobia, supporting mental health and psychosocial needs, and engaging communities in health programs. Protecting refugee and migrant health isn’t just humanitarian obligation—it benefits public health and social cohesion in host communities. When we invest in refugee and migrant health, we build healthier, more inclusive societies benefiting everyone.”


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What health challenges do refugees and migrants face?

Refugees and migrants face multiple health challenges: (1) Journey-related risks—dangerous routes causing injuries, violence including assault and trafficking, environmental exposures (extreme temperatures, inadequate food/water), interrupted healthcare for chronic diseases; (2) Camp/settlement conditions—overcrowding spreading infectious diseases, inadequate water/sanitation causing diarrheal diseases, food insecurity and malnutrition, limited healthcare services, inadequate shelter; (3) Mental health—trauma from violence and loss, chronic stress from uncertainty, PTSD, depression, anxiety; (4) Infectious diseases—respiratory infections, tuberculosis, vaccine-preventable diseases from interrupted immunization, diarrheal diseases; (5) Chronic disease management disruptions for diabetes, hypertension, HIV; (6) Maternal/child health vulnerabilities—lack of prenatal care, child malnutrition, interrupted vaccinations. While refugees/migrants aren’t inherently less healthy than host populations, migration circumstances create vulnerabilities requiring specific interventions.

Q2: Do refugees and migrants bring diseases to host countries?

This is a common misconception. Evidence shows refugees and migrants don’t pose greater infectious disease risks to host populations than local residents. Most infectious disease transmission occurs within communities, not from refugees/migrants introducing new diseases. Refugees/migrants are screened for communicable diseases during resettlement. Health challenges refugees face primarily affect them, not host populations. When outbreaks occur in camps (measles, cholera), they’re contained through vaccination and treatment. Some refugees/migrants may have diseases like tuberculosis or hepatitis from high-prevalence origin countries, but these don’t spread easily and are managed through screening and treatment. Public health benefits from ensuring refugee/migrant health through preventing disease spread in camps, providing vaccination protecting whole communities, and addressing conditions before they worsen. Discrimination based on unfounded disease transmission fears harms individuals and public health.

Q3: What barriers prevent refugees and migrants from accessing healthcare?

Multiple barriers limit healthcare access: (1) Legal/administrative—unclear legal status affecting entitlements, documentation requirements refugees/migrants can’t meet, complexity navigating unfamiliar systems; (2) Financial—lack of insurance or public coverage eligibility, inability to afford out-of-pocket costs, poverty limiting access; (3) Language/cultural—inability to communicate with providers, unfamiliarity with health systems, cultural differences in understanding illness, mistrust of authorities; (4) Geographic—living far from facilities, lack of transportation, settlement in areas with inadequate infrastructure; (5) Discrimination—stigma in healthcare settings, fear of deportation, racism affecting care quality; (6) Knowledge gaps—limited information about available services, unawareness of healthcare rights, lack of health education in appropriate languages. Addressing these requires inclusive policies, affordable care, language services, culturally competent providers, and community engagement.

Q4: How can healthcare systems better serve refugee and migrant populations?

Healthcare systems can improve refugee/migrant health through: (1) Inclusive policies ensuring refugees/migrants can access essential healthcare regardless of legal status; (2) Affordable care through subsidized services, insurance coverage, or eliminating out-of-pocket costs for essential services; (3) Language services providing professional interpreters and translated health materials; (4) Culturally competent care training providers in refugee health issues, cultural sensitivity, and trauma-informed approaches; (5) System navigation support helping refugees/migrants understand and access healthcare; (6) Integration into national health systems rather than parallel services; (7) Chronic disease management ensuring continuity of care for ongoing conditions; (8) Mental health services addressing trauma, depression, anxiety with culturally appropriate approaches; (9) Community health workers from refugee/migrant communities bridging cultural/linguistic gaps; (10) Addressing social determinants including housing, education, employment affecting health. Like ensuring quality of caregenerally, serving refugees/migrants requires systematic approaches.

Q5: What can be done to improve health in refugee camps?

Improving refugee camp health requires: (1) WASH improvements—safe water supply, adequate sanitation facilities, hygiene promotion and supplies, waste management; (2) Adequate healthcare—sufficient health facilities and staff, essential medicines including chronic disease medications, emergency treatment capacity, referral systems for complex cases; (3) Vaccination programs preventing outbreaks of measles, polio, other vaccine-preventable diseases; (4) Nutrition support—adequate food rations with nutritional diversity, supplementary feeding for malnourished children, micronutrient supplementation; (5) Mental health services—counseling, psychological support, trauma-informed care, community-based psychosocial programs; (6) Reduced overcrowding—adequate space per person, proper shelter with weather protection, safe cooking facilities; (7) Safety and protection—preventing gender-based violence, child protection, security within camps; (8) Health education—disease prevention, hygiene practices, nutrition, available services; (9) Community participation—engaging refugees in health program design and implementation. Well-managed camps significantly reduce health risks, though permanent solutions through resettlement or return remain goals.


Focus Key Phrase: Refugee migrant health challenges healthcare access displacement camps

Meta Description: 100 million displaced people worldwide face unique health challenges—learn about refugee and migrant health risks from dangerous journeys, camp conditions, healthcare barriers, mental health trauma, and solutions for inclusive care.


References

  1. World Health Organization. (2024). Refugee and migrant health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/health-topics/refugee-and-migrant-health
  2. World Health Organization. (2024). Refugee and migrant health – Fact Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/refugee-and-migrant-health
  3. UNHCR. (2024). Global Trends: Forced Displacement. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends
  4. Observer Voice. Maternal Health: Protecting Mothers and Saving Lives. Retrieved from https://observervoice.com/maternal-health-protecting-mothers-saving-lives/
  5. Observer Voice. Newborn Health: Protecting Babies in Their First 28 Days. Retrieved from https://observervoice.com/newborn-health-protecting-babies-first-28-days/
  6. Observer Voice. Malaria: Prevention and Treatment. Retrieved from https://observervoice.com/malaria-prevention-treatment/

 

India: Mobility hampers HIV treatment follow-up among migrant labourers in Kerala

HIV cases in Perumbavoor guest workers

Kochi: After a rise in drug-related issues sparked tensions between locals and migrant labourers in Perumbavoor, there is now concern about health department’s difficulty in tracking guest workers, who tested positive for HIV in the last few months, and provide them with treatment. Wrong mobile numbers and addresses and frequent movement within the state due to the nature of work pose hurdles in tracking them.

Health department decided to conduct a field visit to Perumbavoor and Kerala State Aids Control Society (KSACS) will convene a meeting with govt departments such as police, excise, labour and local bodies to chalk out a plan to address the issue.

Data with health department shows that about 26% of those who tested HIV-positive in Perumbavoor area in the past few months were guest workers. The random testing was conducted through Perumbavoor taluk hospital.

Although the department is reluctant to share the total number of people tested and how many turned positive, officials said their real concern was migrant labour. The percentage may not appear alarming, as migrant labour testing HIV-positive is only 1/4th the total number of people who tested positive in Perumbavoor. However, the real worry is different: the migrant population is floating, and health officials are concerned because they are unable to trace many HIV-positive guest workers. Hence, timely intervention has become difficult.

Health officials realised that in most cases, the addresses provided are fake, making it difficult to track them in their home state too. “We are compiling data regarding all HIV cases in the area, including the latest test results,” said a KSACS official.

“By the time we get detailed test results, we fear the infected guest worker would leave here. Attempts to trace them using the phone numbers or address given by them often reach a dead end. We learned that some of them even possess multiple Aadhaar cards,” he added.

Even if addresses are genuine, tracking them isn’t easy. “Their mobility makes it difficult to trace them. Due to the nature of their work, they move from one place to another within days. In some cases, they leave the state. In such cases, we have to seek the support of National Aids Control Organization (NACO),” said another KSACS official.

Although state govt instructed labour and home departments to prepare a registry of guest workers more than four years ago, the work remains incomplete. Labour department was supposed to issue digital ID cards through Athithi portal, but the process is still halfway. Local bodies and health departments are supposed to conduct inspections at the accommodation facilities of guest workers, but they rarely do it.

Health department plans to seek district administration’s support for coordination with various govt departments in the district. The plan is to assign specific targets for each department.

 

Spain: Regularisation of migrants expected to improve HIV diagnosis and prevention

AI translation – Scroll down for article in Spanish

Cesida emphasizes that the extraordinary regularization of migrants will improve their real access to public health

The State Coordinator of HIV and AIDS (Cesida) has applauded the implementation of the procedures for an extraordinary administrative regularization that will affect more than half a million migrants living in Spain. The organization believes that this measure will allow real access to the health system and will help leave behind a situation of structural exclusion with a direct impact on their health and quality of life.

Cesida highlights the relevance of this initiative in the context of the response to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Ordinary access to health makes it possible to advance in the diagnosis, treatment and implementation of combined prevention strategies, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).

The entity has insisted that a health system that aspires to be truly universal must prioritize care for people in the most vulnerable situations, including those at high risk of acquiring HIV.

In this line, Cesida stressed that administrative exclusion not only implies a violation of rights, but also weakens public health policies and the capacity for collective response to the epidemic.

The Venezuelan migrant with HIV and member of the Cesida executive Jesús Cisneros has valued the positive impact of regularization for “all these people who have found themselves for years working in a submerged economy and living in a rather precarious way.”

Likewise, he has asked to continue advancing rules of this type and speed up administrative procedures, since, as he has pointed out, these people come to Spain on many occasions “because their life depends on it, they depend on HIV medication to continue living.”

The Cesida entities that work with the migrant population have already been activated to support the management of this regularization, providing information, social support and legal advice to people who may benefit from the process.

The State Coordinator of HIV and AIDS has also demanded to pay attention to the administrative deadlines and requirements that continue to condition access to health care. Specifically, he pointed out that the times linked to registration, whose resolution period can be extended up to three months, continue to be an element that can significantly delay effective access to health.


Cesida subraya que la regularización extraordinaria de migrantes mejorará su acceso real a la sanidad pública

La Coordinadora Estatal de VIH y sida (Cesida) ha aplaudido la puesta en marcha de los trámites para una regularización administrativa extraordinaria que afectará a más de medio millón de personas migrantes residentes en España. La organización considera que esta medida permitirá un acceso real al sistema sanitario y ayudará a dejar atrás una situación de exclusión estructural con impacto directo en su salud y en su calidad de vida.

Desde Cesida se remarca la relevancia de esta iniciativa en el marco de la respuesta frente al virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). El acceso ordinario a la sanidad posibilita avanzar en el diagnóstico, el tratamiento y la implementación de estrategias de prevención combinada, entre ellas la profilaxis preexposición (PrEP) y la profilaxis posexposición (PEP).

La entidad ha insistido en que un sistema sanitario que aspire a ser verdaderamente universal debe priorizar la atención a las personas en situación de mayor vulnerabilidad, incluidas aquellas con un riesgo elevado de adquirir el VIH.

En esta línea, Cesida ha recalcado que la exclusión administrativa no solo implica una vulneración de derechos, sino que también debilita las políticas de salud pública y la capacidad de respuesta colectiva ante la epidemia.

El migrante venezolano con VIH y miembro de la ejecutiva de Cesida Jesús Cisneros ha puesto en valor el impacto positivo de la regularización para “todas estas personas que se han encontrado durante años trabajando en una economía sumergida y viviendo de una manera bastante precaria”.

Asimismo, ha pedido seguir avanzando en normas de este tipo y acelerar los procedimientos administrativos, ya que, tal y como ha señalado, estas personas llegan a España en muchas ocasiones “porque su vida depende de ello, dependen de la medicación del VIH para seguir viviendo”.

Las entidades de Cesida que trabajan con población migrante ya se han activado para apoyar la gestión de esta regularización, proporcionando información, acompañamiento social y asesoramiento jurídico a las personas que puedan verse beneficiadas por el proceso.

La Coordinadora Estatal de VIH y sida ha reclamado además prestar atención a los plazos y requisitos administrativos que continúan condicionando el acceso a la atención sanitaria. En concreto, ha señalado que los tiempos vinculados al empadronamiento, cuyo plazo de resolución puede alargarse hasta tres meses, siguen siendo un elemento que puede demorar de forma notable el acceso efectivo a la salud.