India: Mobility hampers HIV treatment follow-up among migrant labourers in Kerala

HIV cases in Perumbavoor guest workers

Kochi: After a rise in drug-related issues sparked tensions between locals and migrant labourers in Perumbavoor, there is now concern about health department’s difficulty in tracking guest workers, who tested positive for HIV in the last few months, and provide them with treatment. Wrong mobile numbers and addresses and frequent movement within the state due to the nature of work pose hurdles in tracking them.

Health department decided to conduct a field visit to Perumbavoor and Kerala State Aids Control Society (KSACS) will convene a meeting with govt departments such as police, excise, labour and local bodies to chalk out a plan to address the issue.

Data with health department shows that about 26% of those who tested HIV-positive in Perumbavoor area in the past few months were guest workers. The random testing was conducted through Perumbavoor taluk hospital.

Although the department is reluctant to share the total number of people tested and how many turned positive, officials said their real concern was migrant labour. The percentage may not appear alarming, as migrant labour testing HIV-positive is only 1/4th the total number of people who tested positive in Perumbavoor. However, the real worry is different: the migrant population is floating, and health officials are concerned because they are unable to trace many HIV-positive guest workers. Hence, timely intervention has become difficult.

Health officials realised that in most cases, the addresses provided are fake, making it difficult to track them in their home state too. “We are compiling data regarding all HIV cases in the area, including the latest test results,” said a KSACS official.

“By the time we get detailed test results, we fear the infected guest worker would leave here. Attempts to trace them using the phone numbers or address given by them often reach a dead end. We learned that some of them even possess multiple Aadhaar cards,” he added.

Even if addresses are genuine, tracking them isn’t easy. “Their mobility makes it difficult to trace them. Due to the nature of their work, they move from one place to another within days. In some cases, they leave the state. In such cases, we have to seek the support of National Aids Control Organization (NACO),” said another KSACS official.

Although state govt instructed labour and home departments to prepare a registry of guest workers more than four years ago, the work remains incomplete. Labour department was supposed to issue digital ID cards through Athithi portal, but the process is still halfway. Local bodies and health departments are supposed to conduct inspections at the accommodation facilities of guest workers, but they rarely do it.

Health department plans to seek district administration’s support for coordination with various govt departments in the district. The plan is to assign specific targets for each department.

 

Netherlands: New study links migration and poverty to HIV risk

Immigration and poverty tied to heightened HIV risk in the Netherlands

There is a strong social gradient associated with HIV diagnoses in the Netherlands, Dr Vita Jongen from Stichting HIV Monitoring and colleagues report in The Lancet Regional Health – Europe. People who are poorer or are first-generation immigrants are much more likely to be diagnosed with HIV, while intersections between poverty and migration further increase their vulnerability.

Background

The Netherlands has nearly reached the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets: 95% of people with HIV are diagnosed, 95% of those diagnosed are on treatment and 95% of those on treatment are virally suppressed. Additionally, access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has dramatically reduced HIV transmission, particularly among younger people.

While new HIV diagnoses dropped consistently throughout the 2010s, they’ve stabilised since 2020, at around approximately 500 a year. Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men make up around 60% of these new diagnoses, other men around 20%, women around 16% and trans people around 4%.

However, gaps remain – especially for groups such as women and cisgender straight men. Across Europe, there are gaps in coverage of HIV prevention and treatment for migrants. Migrants often lack in-depth knowledge of how to navigate the health system in a new country and may find that language barriers make access to HIV services a challenge.

At a time of decreasing HIV incidence across Europe, when some groups are disproportionately affected by new diagnoses, researchers are interested in the structural and social factors that may make certain people more vulnerable to acquiring HIV. Here, the focus isn’t on risk groups and sexual behaviours – as has been the focus for most of the epidemic – but instead on broader factors, such as poverty or immigration status, and how these cluster together and intersect to create unique and emerging HIV vulnerabilities.

The study

HIV care in the Netherlands is provided by 23 treatment centres who contribute data to the centralised Stichting HIV Monitoring. While the Netherlands has universal healthcare, this is based on mandatory private insurance contributions. HIV testing is free for specific populations, such as gay men and trans women. Documented migrants have access to the healthcare system, but undocumented migrants may have to pay out of pocket for health-related services. However, any care deemed medically necessary – such as HIV testing and care – should not be withheld, even for undocumented people.

Over 97% of all people living with HIV in the Netherlands also contribute their data to a research cohort, AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands (ATHENA). This is one of the main data sources for the current study.

Additionally, researchers accessed data from Statistics Netherlands for two purposes. The first was to perform comparisons between age and sex-matched individuals in the general population and people diagnosed with HIV. The second was to match HIV diagnosis data with specific individuals represented in Statistics Netherlands data, to investigate potential associations between being diagnosed with HIV and education, income, immigration status and certain health behaviours, such as using mental healthcare services or antidepressant medication. This was done by matching an individual’s date of birth, the first four digits of the postal code of their last known residence and sex at birth. This allowed for linkage between ATHENA and Statistics Netherlands data. If exact matching was not possible, the data was not used for the results.

All people in the ATHENA cohort over 18 and newly diagnosed with HIV in the Netherlands between January 2012 and December 2023 were included. People who migrated to the Netherlands with known HIV were excluded, as were transgender people – due to small numbers and the possible risk of identification.

Intersecting factors create unique vulnerabilities to HIV

For the study period, 6055 men and 1020 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. Most people diagnosed with HIV were aged between 25 and 49 years old – 64% of all diagnoses for both men and women, with very few diagnoses among those aged 18 to 25. The 25-to-49-year-old group was overrepresented when compared to the general Dutch population, where they comprised 44% of all men and 49% of all women.

Of men diagnosed with HIV, most were neither first- or second-generation immigrants (59%), a large proportion had secondary education or higher (41%) and fell into the middle-to-low-income bracket (43%). However, when compared with the general population, there were many more immigrants among those diagnosed with HIV than generally (40% vs. 23%) and more men living below the poverty line among those diagnosed with HIV (23% vs. 12%). There were also sizable differences in those who used mental health care services and antidepressants among those diagnosed with HIV and the general population (7% vs. 5% and 8% vs. 5%, respectively).

Of women diagnosed with HIV, most were first-generation immigrants (55%), a large proportion had mainly primary and secondary education (44%) and their income fell below the poverty line (45%). Moreover, when compared with the general population, there were many more immigrants among those diagnosed with HIV than generally (64% vs. 25%) and there more women living below the poverty line among those diagnosed with HIV (45% vs. 14%). There was a notable difference in those who used antipsychotic medications among people diagnosed with HIV and the general population (5% vs. 2%).

When considering specific socio-economic categories and health behaviours, first-generation immigrant men were over twice as likely to be diagnosed with HIV than non-immigrants (adjusted Odds Ratio 2.21, 95% Confidence Interval 2.08-2.35). This pattern was much stronger for first-generation immigrant women, who were over four times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than non-immigrant women (aOR 4.48, 95% CI 3.87-5.19). Statistically significant increases in HIV diagnoses still held true for second-generation immigrants but were not as pronounced, as these people were born in the Netherlands and likely have better healthcare knowledge and access.

The most notable difference for both women and men related to income: women living below the poverty line were over four times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than high-income women (aOR 4.71, 95% CI 3.8-5.83), while women in the middle to low-income bracket were nearly two and a half times more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than high income women (aOR 2.49, 95% CI 2.05-3.01). For men, this difference was not as dramatic – men living below the poverty line were nearly twice as likely to be diagnosed with HIV than high-income men (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.62-1.89). The poverty line is defined as household income less than 120% of the social minimum, or income needed to survive.

Interestingly, men who used antidepressants were more likely to be diagnosed with HIV than those who did not; for women, antipsychotic medications were more likely to be associated with an HIV diagnosis.

When considering combined demographic, socio-economic and health behaviour factors, certain profiles were more likely to have a predicted risk of being diagnosed with HIV than others. A first-generation immigrant man aged 25 to 49, with income below the poverty line and using antidepressants, would have a 12-fold higher risk of being diagnosed with HIV than a man older than 50, with no immigration history and a high income. Similarly, a first-generation immigrant woman aged 25 to 49, with income below the poverty line, receiving social welfare, and using antipsychotic medications, would have a much higher predicted risk of being diagnosed with HIV than women with differing profiles.

Conclusion

“A disproportionally higher burden of new HIV diagnoses was observed for individuals with not only a migration background, but also economic and mental health vulnerabilities,” the authors conclude. “Barriers to HIV prevention and testing need to be reduced if we are to achieve no new HIV infections and end the HIV epidemic.”

This research is a clear indication of the social gradient: those who are poorer and experience the worst consequences of migration, such as first-generation immigrants, are much more likely to see worse health outcomes, such as being diagnosed with HIV. These negative health consequences ease off for low-to-middle income people and second-generation immigrants but are still visible – even in settings with access to HIV testing and prevention.

Intersections between factors such as poverty and migration heighten HIV vulnerability and need to be adequately and actively acknowledged by any public health policies aimed at eliminating new cases of HIV.

Spain: Regularisation of migrants expected to improve HIV diagnosis and prevention

AI translation – Scroll down for article in Spanish

Cesida emphasizes that the extraordinary regularization of migrants will improve their real access to public health

The State Coordinator of HIV and AIDS (Cesida) has applauded the implementation of the procedures for an extraordinary administrative regularization that will affect more than half a million migrants living in Spain. The organization believes that this measure will allow real access to the health system and will help leave behind a situation of structural exclusion with a direct impact on their health and quality of life.

Cesida highlights the relevance of this initiative in the context of the response to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Ordinary access to health makes it possible to advance in the diagnosis, treatment and implementation of combined prevention strategies, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).

The entity has insisted that a health system that aspires to be truly universal must prioritize care for people in the most vulnerable situations, including those at high risk of acquiring HIV.

In this line, Cesida stressed that administrative exclusion not only implies a violation of rights, but also weakens public health policies and the capacity for collective response to the epidemic.

The Venezuelan migrant with HIV and member of the Cesida executive Jesús Cisneros has valued the positive impact of regularization for “all these people who have found themselves for years working in a submerged economy and living in a rather precarious way.”

Likewise, he has asked to continue advancing rules of this type and speed up administrative procedures, since, as he has pointed out, these people come to Spain on many occasions “because their life depends on it, they depend on HIV medication to continue living.”

The Cesida entities that work with the migrant population have already been activated to support the management of this regularization, providing information, social support and legal advice to people who may benefit from the process.

The State Coordinator of HIV and AIDS has also demanded to pay attention to the administrative deadlines and requirements that continue to condition access to health care. Specifically, he pointed out that the times linked to registration, whose resolution period can be extended up to three months, continue to be an element that can significantly delay effective access to health.


Cesida subraya que la regularización extraordinaria de migrantes mejorará su acceso real a la sanidad pública

La Coordinadora Estatal de VIH y sida (Cesida) ha aplaudido la puesta en marcha de los trámites para una regularización administrativa extraordinaria que afectará a más de medio millón de personas migrantes residentes en España. La organización considera que esta medida permitirá un acceso real al sistema sanitario y ayudará a dejar atrás una situación de exclusión estructural con impacto directo en su salud y en su calidad de vida.

Desde Cesida se remarca la relevancia de esta iniciativa en el marco de la respuesta frente al virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). El acceso ordinario a la sanidad posibilita avanzar en el diagnóstico, el tratamiento y la implementación de estrategias de prevención combinada, entre ellas la profilaxis preexposición (PrEP) y la profilaxis posexposición (PEP).

La entidad ha insistido en que un sistema sanitario que aspire a ser verdaderamente universal debe priorizar la atención a las personas en situación de mayor vulnerabilidad, incluidas aquellas con un riesgo elevado de adquirir el VIH.

En esta línea, Cesida ha recalcado que la exclusión administrativa no solo implica una vulneración de derechos, sino que también debilita las políticas de salud pública y la capacidad de respuesta colectiva ante la epidemia.

El migrante venezolano con VIH y miembro de la ejecutiva de Cesida Jesús Cisneros ha puesto en valor el impacto positivo de la regularización para “todas estas personas que se han encontrado durante años trabajando en una economía sumergida y viviendo de una manera bastante precaria”.

Asimismo, ha pedido seguir avanzando en normas de este tipo y acelerar los procedimientos administrativos, ya que, tal y como ha señalado, estas personas llegan a España en muchas ocasiones “porque su vida depende de ello, dependen de la medicación del VIH para seguir viviendo”.

Las entidades de Cesida que trabajan con población migrante ya se han activado para apoyar la gestión de esta regularización, proporcionando información, acompañamiento social y asesoramiento jurídico a las personas que puedan verse beneficiadas por el proceso.

La Coordinadora Estatal de VIH y sida ha reclamado además prestar atención a los plazos y requisitos administrativos que continúan condicionando el acceso a la atención sanitaria. En concreto, ha señalado que los tiempos vinculados al empadronamiento, cuyo plazo de resolución puede alargarse hasta tres meses, siguen siendo un elemento que puede demorar de forma notable el acceso efectivo a la salud.

Russia: List of diseases for which labour migrants are tested expand to include hepatitis B and C

Migrants arriving in Russia will be examined for hepatitis B, C and D in 2026.

The Ministry of Health has already prepared amendments to the order on medical examination of foreigners, now its draft is under approval, said Natalia Pakskina, Deputy Director of the Department of Emergency Medical Care Organization and Health Risk Management of the Ministry of Health of Russia.

“We are, by and large, on the finish line. We have included just a medical examination of foreigners for hepatitis B and C, including with a delta agent (hepatitis D). Therefore, we will examine foreigners from the same year,”
– Pakskina reported.

Earlier, a bill was submitted to the State Duma, which involves migrants to undergo medical examinations within 30 days from the date of entry into Russia. Now this period is 90 days.
—————————————————————————————–

Прибывающих в Россию мигрантов в 2026 году начнут обследовать на гепатиты B, C и D.

Минздрав уже подготовил изменения в приказ о медицинском освидетельствовании иностранцев, сейчас его проект на согласовании, рассказала замдиректора департамента организации экстренной медицинской помощи и управления рисками здоровью Минздрава России Наталья Пакскина.

«Мы, по большому счету, на финишной прямой. Мы включили как раз медицинское обследование иностранцев на гепатиты В и С, в том числе с дельта-агентом (гепатит D). Поэтому обследовать иностранцев мы будем с этого же года»,
— сообщила Пакскина.
Ранее в Госдуму внесли законопроект, предполагающий прохождение мигрантами медосвидетельствования в течение 30 дней с момента въезда в Россию. Сейчас этот срок составляет 90 дней.
Источник: https://moika78.ru/news/2026-01-28/1254506-v-rossii-nachnut-proveryat-migrantov-na-gepatity-v-s-i-d

US: Department of Health and Human Services bans undocumented immigrants from taxpayer-funded health services

Three years before the first federally funded community health centers in the US opened their doors to patients of all backgrounds, a 1962 law authorized the creation of new clinics to treat domestic migrant and seasonal agriculture workers.

The Migrant Health Act reflected a recognition that a community’s health depends on all who are a part of it, said historian Beatrix Hoffman, PhD, who studies immigration and health policy at Northern Illinois University. “The more people who have access to care, the better,” she added.

Migrant health centers served as a precursor to community health centers, which treat patients no matter their ability to pay. Today, community health centers across the nation are a major source of primary care for another migrant population: undocumented immigrants. But this could change with new restrictions from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

On July 10, HHS announced that undocumented migrants will no longer have access to any of the department’s taxpayer-funded services classified as federal public benefits. In addition to community clinics supported by the Health Center Program, this action affects services such as Head Start, certain substance use and behavioral health programs, and the Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness grant program.

The new guidelines were enacted to “strengthen the integrity and consistency of benefit eligibility,” an HHS spokesperson said in a statement to JAMA Medical News. Public health experts, however, warn the change could undermine care through these programs for all patients.

The Rationale

The new policy reverses a prior interpretation of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), which allowed undocumented immigrants to access certain federal programs.

The change reflects the “taxpayer friendly” posture of President Donald Trump’s administration, said Ge Bai, PhD, CPA, an accounting professor at Johns Hopkins University and unpaid advisor to the Paragon Health Institute, a think tank founded by former Trump health care advisor Brian Blase. “The administration is facing the increasing deficit and worsening national debt, so they have to find all the ways they can to reduce government spending,” she said.

Undocumented immigrants pay sales tax on their purchases, and many pay income and property tax. Bai noted that these contributions do not make up a significant portion of the tax base. However, federal tax payments from undocumented immigrants totaled $59 billion in 2022, according to a report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

The HHS has also stated that these services incentivize illegal immigration. Bai said that would-be migrants consider social programs when debating the risks and benefits of entering the country without authorization. She cited the influx of undocumented immigrants in 2021 through 2023, noting the expansion of the social safety net in response to the COVID-19 pandemic helped spark the migration surge.

Not everyone agrees. Although Hoffman allows that some undocumented immigrants may enter the country seeking specialized treatment, she countered that these cases are extremely rare. “Historically, undocumented people are afraid to access health care because they don’t want to be detected,” she said.

“People don’t migrate to the US to use health services or any other type of public benefit,” said Arturo Vargas Bustamante, PhD, MPP, a public health professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. “People migrate to the US because they have the economic incentive to get jobs.”

As undocumented immigrants tend to use fewer health services than US-born citizens and are ineligible for many federal programs including Medicare, Bustamante argued that their tax contributions subsidize health services for US citizens. A 2022 analysis in JAMA Network Openconcluded that tax contributions and premiums from undocumented immigrants exceeded expenditures by more than $4000 per person.

Bustamante said the benefits of offering services such as vaccinations and prenatal consultations to undocumented immigrants outweigh costs to taxpayers. He doubts the new guidelines will curb health care spending, in part because it could increase reliance on emergency care. Emergency departments remain open to undocumented immigrants because of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, which prevents hospitals that receive Medicare dollars, as the overwhelming majority do, from refusing to treat patients in emergency conditions. There, care may be covered by emergency Medicaid that is available regardless of immigration status with qualified expenses varying by state.

An Ounce of Prevention?

Without primary care services through community health centers, Bustamante and others predict that undocumented immigrants will forgo treatment for as long as possible until they require emergency care.

“They won’t go to get medication. They won’t go to get regular checkups. They won’t go to get preventive care,” said Annie Ro, PhD, associate professor at the University of California Irvine Joe C. Wen School of Population and Public Health.

Losing access to primary care leaves people with fewer options to manage chronic conditions, which can lead to new health problems like infectious disease, said Nicole Swartwood, MSPH, who studies public health at Harvard University.

For example, unmanaged diabetes might increase the odds that a latent tuberculosis infection will become active and contagious—and individuals born in many countries outside the US are already at greater risk of tuberculosis.

Homelessness and intravenous drug use are also linked to tuberculosis, Swartwood added. The new restrictions would block undocumented immigrants from HHS services related to those concerns as well.

Meanwhile, community health centers play a role in infectious disease surveillance, including screening for asymptomatic latent tuberculosis. If undocumented patients are barred from these clinics, their condition may not be identified and they may transmit tuberculosis to others. “Nondocumented migrants are not living in isolation,” said Swartwood, adding that they are part of their communities and interact with others.

The Broader Implications

Impaired infectious disease monitoring is just one way the HHS policy may affect more than just undocumented immigrants. Multiple experts said they worry the new rules will sow fear that deters migrants from accessing care even when they qualify for it.

Ro pointed out that many undocumented immigrants have children who are US citizens by birth. “These kids are not targeted by these restrictions, but because their parents are concerned, we’ll probably see a chilling effect within families,” she said.

Determining eligibility could itself pose a challenge for clinics. “Providers are legally bound to provide care when it’s needed, but they’re put in this position where they have to verify somebody’s immigration status,” Ro continued. “That’s not really their job.”

HHS has not yet released program-specific guidance, but Ro fears that calling on understaffed clinics to enforce these restrictions will divert time and resources away from patient care.

“Everyone is going to be affected, not only immigrants themselves, but also migrant families, mixed-status families, and US-born citizens who are going to encounter more expensive health services, longer waitlists, and less provider availability,” Bustamante said.

A Policy Pattern

The HHS rules are not the only rollback of services for undocumented immigrants this year. California, Illinois, and Minnesota have each scaled down or cut eligibility for state Medicaid coverage previously offered to immigrants of any status.

In April, the Idaho state legislature passed HB 135, which excluded undocumented immigrants from services such as food pantries and prenatal care. Controversially, the bill originally required proof of legal status from patients receiving medication at programs funded through Part B of the federal Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program.

“HIV is very treatable, and we have great medications for it,” said Abby Davids, MD, MPH, who treats patients with HIV at a federally qualified community health center in Boise. “But if you lose access to your antiretrovirals, then HIV is universally fatal.”

Davids added that without medication, people living with HIV could transmit the virus to others: “From an individual patient standpoint and from a community standpoint, it’s a really horrific situation.”

The portion of HB 135 restricting HIV treatment was blocked by a federal judge in late June following a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of Davids and 5 unnamed patients. The next month, a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction preventing immigration status–based restriction to Ryan White Part B programs until all litigation is settled.

HHS has not responded to requests from JAMA Medical News for comment about how eligibility for Ryan White–funded programs may change because of the new federal guidelines.

Undocumented immigrants can still receive emergency Medicaid in all 50 states, although the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has agreed to share information about Medicaid enrollment with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, the Associated Press reported in July.

“This administration has been so aggressive in targeting any kind of benefit that would remotely touch the undocumented immigrant population,” Ro said.

Published Online: August 8, 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.12999

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Global study reveals 50 countries still enforce HIV-related travel restrictions

A new global study presented this week at the 13th IAS Conference on HIV Science in Kigali (IAS 2025) has revealed that 50 countries around the world continue to enforce HIV-related travel and residence restrictions, in clear violation of international human rights principles.

The data, shared by the HIV Justice Network through its new platform Positive Destinations, highlights the persistence of discriminatory laws and policies that prevent people living with HIV from freely travelling, working, studying, or settling in many parts of the world.

Despite progress – 83 countries now have no HIV-specific travel restrictions, and many others have adopted more inclusive approaches – 17 countries still impose severe measures such as outright entry bans, mandatory testing, and deportation. These include Bhutan, Brunei, Egypt, Iran, Kuwait, Malaysia, Russia, and the United Arab Emirates. Migrants and students are often disproportionately affected, with some unaware of the rules until after testing or disclosure, resulting in forced returns, loss of income, and separation from families.

Another 33 countries – including Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore – have partial restrictions. These include requirements for HIV testing in visa applications, discretionary decisions based on perceived healthcare costs, and reduced access to essential services. Although these policies may appear neutral on the surface, they continue to disadvantage people living with HIV.

“These restrictions are rooted in outdated public health thinking and perpetuate stigma,” said Edwin J Bernard, HIV Justice Network’s Executive Director. “They obstruct access to healthcare, education, and family life, especially for migrants and refugees.”

   Click on the image to download the poster

In 2024, Positive Destinations documented several cases of deportation based solely on HIV status: Kuwait deported over 100 people, Russia’s Dagestan region deported nine, and Libya deported two. Such practices are increasingly being challenged by legal action. In Canada, for example, a court case led by the HIV Legal Network contests the “excessive demand” clause of immigration law, arguing it violates the country’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

However, policy reform has been uneven. Australia raised its health cost threshold for visa eligibility, slightly easing access to temporary stays, but permanent residency remains elusive for many people with HIV. A recent case saw an Italian teacher denied residency due solely to his HIV-positive status.

The study also underscores how HIV-related migration barriers often intersect with other forms of criminalisation and discrimination. In Uzbekistan and Russia, HIV criminalisation laws are paired with mandatory HIV testing for migrants. In the U.S., HIV-positive and LGBTQ+ asylum seekers continue to face mistreatment in detention centres. And in a tragic case in Turkey, a Syrian trans woman was reportedly deported after her HIV status was disclosed and later killed upon return.

The authors of the study call for urgent action: “Eliminating these harmful policies is essential to ending AIDS, achieving universal health coverage, and upholding the dignity and rights of people living with HIV everywhere,” said Bernard.

Positive Destinations, which hosts the updated Global Database on HIV-Specific Travel and Residence Restrictions, is available at www.positivedestinations.info


EP0623 Addressing HIV-related travel restrictions: Progress and challenges in eliminating discriminatory policies by Edwin J Bernard, Sylvie Beaumont, Elliot Hatt, and Sofía Várguez was presented at IAS2025 by Brent Allan at the 13th IAS Conference on HIV Science, Kigali, Rwanda.

US: Doctors report dangerous delays in care among migrants fearing deportation

Since President Trump announced plans for mass deportations and rescinded protections for hospitals and clinics, health care facilities have seen a jump in no-shows.

A man lay on a New York City sidewalk with a gun shot wound, clutching his side.

Emily Borghard, a social worker who hands out supplies to the homeless through her nonprofit, found him and pulled out her phone, preparing to dial 911. But the man begged her not to make the call, she said.

“No, no, no,” he said, telling her in Spanish that he would be deported.

Ms. Borghard tried to explain that federal law required hospitals to treat him, regardless of his immigration status, but he was terrified.

“He said, ‘If I go to the emergency department, that will put me on their radar,’” she recalled in an interview recounting the incident.

Across the country, doctors, nurses and social workers are increasingly concerned that people with serious medical conditions, including injuries, chronic illnesses and high-risk pregnancies, are forgoing medical care out of fear of being apprehended by immigration officials. Since the Trump administration announced plans for mass deportations and rescinded a Biden-era policy that protected spaces like hospitals, medical clinics and churches from immigration enforcement, doctors said they have seen sharp increases in patient anxiety and appointment no-show rates.

If the trend continues, health care officials say, the list of consequences could be long: Infectious diseases circulating unnecessarily; worsening health care costs because of untreated chronic illnesses; and dangerous birth complications for women who wait too long to seek help, among others.

In a survey conducted by KFF, a health policy research organization, 31 percent of immigrants said that worries about immigration status — their own or that of a family member — were negatively affecting their health. About 20 percent of all immigrants surveyed said they were struggling with their eating and sleeping; 31 percent reported worsened stress and anxiety.

A White House spokesman did not respond to messages seeking comment. When the administration announced that it was ending protections at hospitals on Jan. 21, a statement from the Department of Homeland Security said the new policy was intended “to enforce our immigration laws and catch criminal aliens.”

Research has shown that immigration crackdowns are linked with poorer birth outcomes and mental health status, lapses in care, and fewer people accessing the types of public programs that reduce illness and poverty overall.

“We’re really creating not just very serious health risks, but economic risks in the long run for our country,” said Julie Linton, a pediatrician and member of the committee on federal government affairs for the American Academy of Pediatrics. “These policies are creating very real fear and uncertainty for people and have a tremendous impact on their ability to function on a day-to-day level.”

Many immigrant communities suffer from high rates of chronic conditions such as high blood pressure and diabetes, which, if left untreated, can lead to heart attack, stroke and other grave complications.

That is why doctors worry about patients like Maria, a 47-year-old woman with pre-diabetes, who has been going to the same primary care clinic ever since she arrived in the United States from El Salvador 20 years ago. Even during the first Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration, she continued to seek medical care. But when the protections around hospitals and clinics were rescinded earlier this year, Maria canceled her appointment to have her blood sugar checked, a routine and crucial element of diabetes prevention in patients like her.

“We’re very scared of being in the clinic and having ICE arrive while waiting to be called,” she said in Spanish, referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Maria, who asked that her last name not be published, said that she is in a state of “constant anguish.” She said she avoids leaving the house and is working on a plan for the care of her children, who are American citizens, in case she and her husband are deported.

One of their daughters, who is 15, is being treated for fatty liver disease and the other, 11, needs therapy for a developmental condition. Their older daughter has another doctor’s appointment in June. Maria and her husband don’t want to interrupt her care, but they are worried about taking her there themselves. “It’s very complicated,” Maria said. “I can put myself at risk for my children. But if it’s for my own health, I prefer to let it go.”

The consequences of abandoning regular medical care can turn serious quickly, however. Jim Mangia, president of St. John’s Community Health Network in Los Angeles, described one patient with diabetes who stopped showing up for a weekly diabetes education class. When a clinic staff member called the woman, they discovered she was afraid to even go to the grocery store, and had been subsisting for days on tortillas and coffee, he said.

“Thank God we reached her and she came in,” said Mr. Mangia, whose network serves an estimated 25,000 undocumented patients across more than 20 locations. Tests at the clinic showed that her blood sugar had become dangerously high.

“That’s what we’re going to see more and more of,” Mr. Mangia said. “It kind of breaks my heart to talk about it.”

For doctors working in urgent care settings, a drop-off in immigrants has become apparent through some unusual metrics. For example, Dr. Amy Zeidan, an emergency room physician in Atlanta, said that requests for Spanish-language interpretation in her hospital’s emergency department had fallen more than 60 percent from January to February.

Theresa Cheng, an emergency room physician at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, said one of her residents had seen an immigrant patient who had suffered multiple facial fractures from an assault, but had not sought care for more than two weeks. “There is tremendous fear,” Dr. Cheng said.

In late January, Dr. Cheng said, she saw a patient who arrived with severely untreated diabetes. The patient, an undocumented woman, said she had waited to receive help because she was scared. She died that day.

Dr. Carolina Miranda, a family physician in the Bronx, spoke of a patient who had been granted asylum but, fearful of ICE, had failed to show up for a doctor’s appointment about a possible brain tumor.

Similar delays or cancellations are arising among pregnant women and new mothers, according to obstetrician-gynecologists around the country. Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician in Indiana, said a patient had skipped her postpartum visit, explaining that she would no longer be leaving her house. On an obstetrics floor in a San Diego hospital, multiple staff members said they had seen an overnight drop-off following the inauguration in the number of immigrant women coming in with acute issues during their pregnancies.

“Obviously those women still exist,” said one doctor, who asked not to be identified because her employer forbade her from speaking publicly on the matter. “I fear it’s going to increase maternal mortality over time.”

Many of the children of immigrant parents who have skipped appointments or left medications unfilled are American citizens. But in mixed-status families, parents who are at risk of deportation are often unwilling to take the risk of going to the clinic or pharmacy.

A pediatrician at a health center that cares for underserved populations on the central coast of California reported a 30 percent increase in no-shows for pediatric appointments. Many of those who do bring their children, and are referred elsewhere for specialty care, such as speech therapy, or an autism evaluation, refuse, saying they are too frightened, said the pediatrician, who asked to be unidentified because he wasn’t authorized to speak publicly.

Dr. Tania Caballero, a pediatrician at Johns Hopkins who sees patients at a health center for underserved groups called Baltimore Medical System, said she had encountered parents who had not wanted to go with their babies to the emergency room out of fear, and parents of children with chronic conditions like cerebral palsy, asthma, and Type 1 diabetes who had told her they have stopped getting vital care.

“I tell patients, ‘I can’t control what happens outside of my space, and I can’t control if somebody comes into my space, But you know me. I have the tools, and I want to help you navigate this journey and do it together,’” she said.

Some parents of children in other dire situations — such as those receiving cancer treatment — are hoping that their child’s condition might actually protect them. Some have asked pediatricians for letters explaining their child’s medical requirements, in hopes that immigration officials who detain them might be convinced that the child needs to stay in the United States to survive.

Dr. Lisa Gwynn, a pediatrician in South Florida who serves families from across the Caribbean and South America, said that her plummeting patient attendance rate is particularly worrisome because patients are missing out on childhood vaccines necessary for preventing diseases like measles, pneumonia and whooping cough.

Dr. Gwynn also worries that without coming to see her, children who have experienced severe trauma before coming to the United States aren’t being connected to social workers or psychologists who can help.

“Imagine your children living in a home where everyone’s scared, and they’ve come to this country to not feel scared anymore,” she said. “We know that stress does not fare well for health. Period. Kids don’t perform as well in school, they have mental health issues, depression, anxiety.”

Some medical facilities have said they will comply with immigration officials. NYU Langone, in New York City, sent a memo to employees warning them not to try to protect illegal migrants. But many other health centers and organizations are finding ways to take a stand, telling staff to display “Know Your Rights” information on the walls and to never record their immigration status in a patient’s medical records.”

Last week, the New England Journal of Medicine published an article by two doctors and a lawyer detailing how physicians can continue to provide health care and lawfully push back in the face of some ICE requests.

The St. John’s clinic network in Los Angeles recently launched an ambitious home visitation program in which a doctor, nurse and medical assistant visit patients where they live to perform exams and deliver medications. They aim to inform all 25,000 of their undocumented patients of this option.

In the New York area, a hospital association suggested designating a “hospital liaison” who can be paged to quickly usher an agent into a private office, and then ask to see a signed warrant, which would then be reviewed by in-house counsel.

At the emergency room of University Hospital, a safety net facility in Newark, staff members hand out cards, in Spanish and other languages, reminding patients of their rights. “You have the right to refuse consent for immigration or the police to search yourself, your car or your home,” the cards state.

But even there, the fear is palpable. Annalee M. Baker, an emergency physician, said she had seen a young woman who said her partner had beaten her until she was unconscious. Covered in welts and bruises, she had waited hours to come in. The reason given: she was terrified that her partner would be deported.

Dr. Baker also treated a minor who had been stabbed; she had needed his parents’ consent to treat him, but the boy had been skittish about providing any details about them, out of fear they might be caught in the immigration dragnet.

Still, it is the people who never come in at all that haunt Dr. Baker the most.

“The tragic message to these people is: Be a shadow and hope that you do not die.”

Sarah Kliff contributed reporting.

Emily Baumgaertner Nunn is a national health reporter for The Times, focusing on public health issues that primarily affect vulnerable communities.

Nina Agrawal is a Times health reporter.

Jessica Silver-Greenberg is a Times investigative reporter writing about big business with a focus on health care. She has been a reporter for more than a decade.

Botswana: New research shows healthcare worker face ethical challenges in the provision of healthcare to migrants

“No, it is not a breach of my oath because it is beyond my control; I use the policies that are in place.” Ethical challenges faced by healthcare workers in the provision of healthcare to cross-border migrants in Botswana

Abstract

Background

With a growing global population of migrants, understanding the complex dynamics between healthcare providers and policy restrictions is crucial for ensuring equitable access to healthcare. The main objective of this qualitative study was to explore the ethical challenges faced by health care providers in the provision of health care to migrants.

Methods

We conducted in –depth interviews with 11 healthcare providers, which were analysed using thematic analyse. Atlas ti software was used to analysis the data.

Results

Healthcare workers reported facing ethical challenges as a result of not being able to provide medical care to migrant patients because healthcare policies deny them access to healthcare. These policies make it difficult for healthcare professionals to fulfil their duties in accordance with their oath. Failure to provide healthcare to migrant patients can cause moral distress for healthcare workers and affect their well-being. Reporting migrant patients to the police was mentioned as another ethical challenge, which is a breach of confidentiality. Several healthcare providers have developed strategies to address the limitations of migrants’ access to healthcare, including encouraging migrants to access healthcare from their home country and using private healthcare facilities.

Conclusions

Health policies influence the way health care providers carry out their tasks, which can either positively or negatively impact access for vulnerable migrant groups. To address the challenges faced by healthcare providers in implementing their professional ethics, inclusive policies should be introduced, and human rights and ethics training should be provided, as well as ongoing dialogue to ensure that healthcare providers fulfil their professional obligations toward all migrant patients.

The full study is available at: https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-025-01195-4

Increased risk of tuberculosis and HIV co-infection for migrants in the Uganda EU/EAA

Adult migrants in the UK and EU/EEA have worse TB outcomes than non-migrants

New research published today in the European Respiratory Journal found that adult migrants in the UK and EU/EEA fare worse on a range of TB outcomes than non-migrants in those countries.

Researchers led by Dr Heinke Kunst, Reader in Respiratory Medicine at Queen Mary University of London and Honorary Consultant in Respiratory Medicine at Barts Health NHS Trust, conducted a systematic review of current evidence on diagnosis of active TB in migrants entering the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) and UK.

The work, titled “Tuberculosis in adult migrants in Europe: a TBnet consensus statement” was delivered in collaboration with TBnetscientists with key contribution from Professor Christoph Lange, Professor of Respiratory Medicine.

The review included the clinical presentation and diagnostic delay, treatment outcomes of drug sensitive TB, prevalence and treatment outcomes of multidrug/rifampicin-resistant (MDR/RR)-TB and TB/HIV co-infection.

It showed that migrants have an increased risk of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB infection that occurs in organs other than the lungs) compared to pulmonary tuberculosis. It also showed that migrants have an increased risk of tuberculosis and HIV co-infection compared to non-migrants.

The findings also showed an increased risk for multi drug-resistant/rifampicin resistant tuberculosis in migrants with TB when compared to non-migrants with TB. Further to this, migrants with drug susceptible tuberculosis (TB which is not resistant to treatment drugs such as rifampicin) had an increased risk for unfavourable treatment outcomes when compared to non-migrants.

This is the first systematic review to show that migrants with tuberculosis in the UK and EU/EAA have worse outcomes compared to non-migrants with tuberculosis. Based on these findings and expert opinions consensus, the researchers provided recommendation statements to guide the management of migrants with tuberculosis in these countries.

Consensus recommendations include screening of migrants for tuberculosis/latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) according to country data; a minimal package for tuberculosis care in drug susceptible and multidrug/rifampicin drug resistant tuberculosis; implementation of migrant-sensitive strategies; free healthcare and preventive treatment for migrants with HIV co-infection.

Dr Kunst said: “Migrant populations entering Europe have poorer tuberculosis outcomes than native populations. As cases of tuberculosis are rising in Europe, we need urgent robust strategies to strengthen screening, rapid diagnosis, and treatment in these hard-to-reach populations.”

Migrant-sensitive strategies have been shown to be effective to improve migrant health. These include availability of interpreters and language-appropriate written materials, healthcare provider training in culture-sensitive issues, health education of migrants, strengthening community engagement and social support.

Interestingly, there was no evidence on use of migrant sensitive strategies to improve outcomes of migrants with tuberculosis in the UK and EU/EEA. The researchers hope that the findings may influence public health policy nationally and internationally. Migrant sensitive strategies should be included into routine care of migrants not only for migrants with tuberculosis but also those with other infectious diseases such as viral hepatitis.

Tuberculosis research at Queen Mary

This work complements existing tuberculosis research at Queen Mary in migrants and tuberculosis. Dr Kunst has conducted The CATAPULT trial (Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in migrants in primary care versus secondary care) funded by Barts Charity recently published in the European Respiratory Journal. The trial showed that the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in recent migrants to the UK can be safely and effectively managed within primary care when compared to specialist secondary care services at a lower cost. Read more.

Dr Kunst has conducted a NIHR funded study on evaluating uptake of latent tuberculosis infection screening in migrants (Uptake, effectiveness and acceptability of routine screening of pregnant migrants for latent tuberculosis infection in antenatal care) and Prof. Adrian Martineau leads a tuberculosis research programme to develop a new diagnostic test for latent tuberculosis infection.

Surveying ECDC report presents the results of survey on HIV prevention and barriers among migrants in the EU/EEA

HIV and migrants in the EU/EEA – Monitoring the implementation of the Dublin Declaration on partnership to fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and Central Asia: 2024 progress report

This report presents the results of a survey among EU/EEA Member States in relation to the HIV epidemic among migrants and current national prevention interventions, policies and barriers to the public health response.

Executive summary

Background

In 2023, migrants accounted for almost half of new HIV diagnoses in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA) remaining a key population affected by HIV across the European region. Migrants living with HIV face numerous intersecting stigmas related to their HIV and migration status, as well as broader racial and cultural discrimination. Moreover, access to health services for undocumented migrants is not universally guaranteed in the EU/EEA, which hinders HIV prevention, testing and treatment services for this group and could contribute to HIV transmission in these communities, including post-migration acquirement of HIV.

For this report, migrants are defined as ‘people born abroad’ (i.e. those born outside the reporting country, regardless of place of HIV acquisition or diagnosis). This categorisation encompasses a broad range of individuals, some of whom may also be included in other key populations such as men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, or sex workers. It includes those who have migrated from within the EU/EEA as well as those who have come from outside the region and will be diverse in terms of socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics including ethnicity, nationality, migration status, gender, income, and educational level.

Methods

ECDC monitors the implementation of the 2004 Dublin Declaration [1,2]. Between February and May 2024, ECDC implemented an online survey among EU/EEA Member States to collect the most recent data from 2023. The survey contained specific questions in relation to the HIV epidemic among migrants, in addition to questions relating to the current national prevention interventions, policies and barriers to the public health response. This report presents the results of the survey.

Status of implementation of combination prevention

Combination prevention is an approach that combines biomedical, behavioural, and structural interventions and strategies for HIV prevention, working on different levels, including individual, community, and societal/national levels, into one comprehensive programme. Key findings include:

  • Twenty-seven countries of the EU/EEA reported having a national HIV prevention strategy to reduce the number of new HIV infections. Of those, 89% (24 countries) reported that their strategy specifically mentioned migrants as a key population to whom actions and services are targeted.
  • Only seven countries reported medium-to-high coverage of condom and lubricant provision programmes targeting migrants.
  • Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) availability in the EU/EEA has improved significantly since 2016. While data on the number of migrants accessing PrEP was generally limited, other findings suggest that PrEP may be inaccessible to many migrants: 13 countries reported difficulties in reaching both documented and undocumented migrants with PrEP, and three more countries reported difficulties in reaching only undocumented migrants. Seven countries reported that PrEP was not accessible for undocumented migrants, and in at least five more countries, it was accessible only at cost or through private providers.
  • The vast majority of countries reported no restrictions on access to testing for undocumented migrants. They also reported the availability of different testing interventions which might facilitate access to testing for undocumented migrants. However, no data to support this assumption were available. It should also be noted that self-testing and community-based testing were not universally provided across EU/EEA countries and these need to be scaled up to reach key migrant populations.

Progress in reaching the continuum of HIV care targets

The continuum of HIV care is a conceptual framework that provides a snapshot of the critical stages in achieving viral suppression among people living with HIV. Only five out of 30 countries provided full data to monitor all stages of the continuum of care for migrants. Key findings include:

  • There is progress for migrants along the continuum of HIV care across the EU/EEA, but limited available data suggest that only some countries were meeting one or more of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 95-95-95 targets to be achieved by 2025:
    • Approximately 93% of migrants living with HIV in the EU/EEA knew their HIV status (based on
      reporting from six countries).
    • Of migrants diagnosed with HIV, 84% had initiated antiretroviral treatment (ART), (based on
      reporting from nine countries).
    • Of the migrants on treatment, 95% were virally suppressed (based on reporting from nine
      countries).
  • As of 2023, only Luxembourg was meeting the 2025 substantive target of 86% viral suppression among all migrants estimated to be living with HIV, followed by Belgium, which was within 5% of the target.

Conclusions and recommendations

Progress has been made in the implementation of combination prevention and in reaching the continuum of HIV care targets for migrant populations in the EU/EEA. Recommendations include implementing migrant-tailored, nonstigmatising, linguistically and culturally appropriate HIV prevention programmes for all migrant populations, scaling up testing services, in particular community-based efforts including self- and home testing, and strengthening links between HIV support services and other services such as social services to meet patient needs.

Only five countries within the EU/EEA reported data for all stages of the continuum of care. Countries should continue to improve monitoring and surveillance data for HIV in migrant populations, to inform decision-making on the provision and targeting of prevention, testing and care services.

The full report can be downloaded here: HIV and migrants in the EU/EEA – Monitoring the implementation of the Dublin Declaration on partnership to fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and Central Asia: 2024 progress report (2023 data)