US: REPEAL ACT to modernise HIV criminalisation laws reintroduced with bipartisan support

Yesterday, California Congresswoman Barbara Lee (Democrat) was joined by Florida Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Republican) to introduce a new version of the ‘Repeal Existing Policies that Encourage and Allow Legal HIV Discrimination Act’ (the ‘REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act’, or the ‘REPEAL Act’) first introduced by Congresswoman Lee in September 2011.

The REPEAL Act was the first to take on the issue of HIV criminalisation in the United States. The first time around it achieved 41 co-sponsors, all of whom were Democrats.

It is notable this this time, the REPEAL Act (known formally as H.R. 1843) has intially been co-sponsored by a Republican, suggesting the Act may go further this time and make it out of committee and on to the floor for consideration.

A press release issued yesterday by Congresswoman Lee’s office summarises the proposed legislation (which can be read in full and downloaded below):

“These laws are based on bias, not science. We need to make sure that our federal and state laws don’t discriminate against people who are living with HIV. These laws breed fear, discrimination, distrust, and hatred, and we’ve got to modernize them. That’s exactly what this legislation would do,” said Congresswoman Barbara Lee.

Today, 32 states and 2 U.S. territories have criminal statutes based on outdated information regarding HIV/AIDS. This bipartisan legislation would allow federal and state officials and community stakeholders to work together to review the efficacy of laws that target people living with HIV/AIDS. The REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act would authorize the Attorney General, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Defense to monitor new and existing laws imposing criminal liability against people with HIV/AIDS and to establish a set of best practices for legislatures to consider when proposing such legislation.

Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen added, “I’m pleased to co-sponsor this bipartisan bill that will help end the serious problem of discrimination in criminal and civil cases against those who are HIV positive. Singling out and discriminating against those living with HIV is not in line with our American values and we must do better. The legislation seeks to modernize our current outdated laws and bring them into the 21st century. I urge my Republican and Democrat colleagues to join Barbara and me in helping those persons living with HIV live as healthy and normal a life as possible.”

If passed, the act will be a key step towards ending unfair and unjust HIV criminalization laws in the United States by developing a set of best practices for the treatment of HIV in criminal and civil commitment cases, issuing guidance to states based on those best practices, and monitoring how states change policies consistent with that guidance.

REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act of 2013

Lambda Legal Urges Congress to Pass the REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act

Lambda Legal is voicing its support the REPEAL HIV Discrimination Act, which would encourage states to reconsider laws and practices that unfairly target people with HIV for consensual sex and conduct that poses no real risk of HIV transmission. Scott Schoettes, Lambda Legal’s HIV Project Director, says: “The more messages we can send to states to modernize or eliminate HIV criminalization laws the better—and that is exactly what this bill does. It is high time the nation’s HIV criminalization laws reflect the current reality of living with HIV, both from medical and social perspectives. Except for perhaps the most extreme cases, the criminal law is far too blunt an instrument to address the subtle dynamics of HIV disclosure.”

US: Well-meaning bill to repeal Maryland's HIV-specific criminal law may do more harm than good, advocates warn

A Maryland lawmaker and a handful of local advocates have started the course to repeal the state’s HIV-specific criminal law, and if other states’ efforts are any indication, Maryland’s path will likely be a long and winding one. Maryland Del. Shirley Nathan-Pulliam (D-Baltimore County) decided last week to withdraw a short-lived bill that would have repealed a state law that makes it a misdemeanor crime – punishable by a fine of up to $2,500 and/or three years in prison – for a person who has HIV to “knowingly transfer or attempt to transfer” the virus to another person. Nathan-Pulliam said she withdrew the bill after hearing from HIV advocates who feared a straight repeal of the state law might do more harm than good.

Iowa: HIV-specific criminal law reform moves out of committee to the Senate

DES MOINES — HIV-positive people who have sex without disclosing their status would face reduced penalties, similar to those for transmitting other communicable diseases, under a proposal advanced Tuesday in the Iowa Senate. The bill introduced by Sen. Matt McCoy would allow people who intentionally transmit the virus to their partner to be sentenced to a maximum of 10 years in prison. That’s more in line with punishments for transmitting other diseases, such as hepatitis C.

McCoy has introduced versions of the bill in past years, but this is the first time it made it to the floor. Sen. Herman Quirmbach, D-Ames, voted to move the measure out of committee, saying it is wrong to single out those with HIV. “I think it’s entirely appropriate to treat all diseases of a similar nature, chronic incurable diseases, in the same fashion, and the penalties of the current law are Draconian, to say the least,” he said. Despite supporting the bill, Quirmbach said he agreed with concerns raised by two Republicans, who said they opposed the measure because unlike the current law, it doesn’t require infected people to tell a partner of their illness.

hivandhepatitis.com – President's HIV/AIDS Council Responds to Unjust HIV Criminalization Laws | HIV Policy & Advocacy

The Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA) passed a resolution this month stating that punishments imposed for HIV non-disclosure or exposureareout of proportion to actual harm inflicted, and that HIV criminalization is bad public health policy that fuels the epidemic.

Iowa legislators introduce HIV de-criminalization bill – The Daily Iowan

State lawmakers introduced a bill this week that, if passed, would change the human immunodeficiency virus criminalization laws in Iowa. Sen. Steve Sodders, D-State Center, worked extensively on the bill with Sen. Matt McCoy, D-Des Moines. “[Iowa’s criminal HIV law] was put on the books when HIV and AIDS were first coming out and little was known about it,” Sodders said. “We have more information, better drugs, and we know more about the transmission of HIV so we also need to update our law to avoid being overly punitive in cases where they don’t need to be.”

US: Interview with Washington State parliamentarian on revising HIV criminal law

A well-meaning law that created stricter penalties for people who knowingly spread HIV to others should be revised to destigmatize those with the illness, says state Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver. Moeller has introduced a bill to remove references to HIV in the state’s criminal assault laws while also preserving the tough penalties for criminals who intentionally infect another person with a serious disease.

US: Interview with Senator Matt McCoy on modernising Iowa's HIV criminal law

“We have a situation in Iowa where the law did not differentiate between exposure and transmission,” says Sen. Matt McCoy.  He’s introducing a bill that he says will modernize the law and recognize that people with HIV can lead healthy lives. “What we wanted to do was de-stigmatize HIV,” says McCoy.  ”We have a separate statute for HIV.  We don’t have a separate statute for tuberculosis or other contagious diseases.”

The Register's Editorial: It's time to rethink Iowa's HIV sex law

When you look at the size of the Iowa Code, it’s obvious state officials excel at creating new laws. They are champing at the bit to add more this legislative session. If their goal is really to make Iowa a better place to live, our elected officials should muster as much enthusiasm for repealing problematic statutes.

Des Moines Democratic Senator Matt McCoy wants to change Iowa's HIV disclosure law

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) – A Des Moines lawmaker plans to introduce legislation that would reduce penalties for HIV-positive people who have sex without disclosing their health condition. Des Moines Democratic Sen. Matt McCoy says he wants to change the law to reduce penalties and focus on people who purposefully infect others with the virus.Under the current law, HIV-positive people who have sex without disclosing their condition can face up to 25 years in prison if convicted, regardless of whether someone is infected. “That is truly a Draconian punishment,” McCoy said. “Being diagnosed with HIV is no longer the death sentence it once was.”

McCoy wants to change the law so someone convicted of intentional or attempted transmission of the virus could be sentenced to a maximum of five years in prison and face a $750 to $7,500 fine. That would put HIV in the same criminal category as transmitting any other communicable disease, such as Hepatitis C. McCoy also wants to end a requirement that people convicted must be placed on a sex offender registry for life.

The Legislature unanimously approved the current law in 1998. The law was approved, in part, as a reaction to a 1996 case in New York where a man intentionally infected 13 women and girls with HIV. Among those voting for the Iowa law was McCoy, who is openly gay. McCoy said the current law made sense based on what was known about HIV and AIDS, but times have changed. “The fact that I’m gay has a real impact on my sensitivity to this issue,” McCoy said. “Clearly, I’m extremely impacted by the gay community and sensitive to people living with HIV. “I just feel it’s the right thing to do for this group of people that have been so stigmatized.”

The proposed changes to the law would take into account whether an HIV-positive person took steps to prevent transmission of the disease, such as using a condom and taking medication that makes it less likely that a sexual partner would be infected. Medications have dramatically improved over the decades, and with proper treatment HIV-positive people can greatly reduce the amount of virus in their blood and make transmission of the disease unlikely.

Randy Mayer, who heads an Iowa Department of Public Health bureau that oversees HIV, said the best way officials can reduce the spread of HIV is to encourage partners to disclose their HIV status to each other. That’s why he agrees with McCoy that the law should be changed. “The law was originally set up to encourage disclosure, but it’s doing the opposite,” he said. “The law is frequently cited by people we work with as something that creates stigma and distrust of the system. … It’s what’s creating stigma.”

McCoy has previously tried to change the law but his bills have become stuck in committees. This time, he said he has support from health care professionals, HIV/AIDS advocacy groups, law enforcement and the Iowa attorney general’s office. Since the Legislature approved the Iowa law, 25 people have been convicted, though only two of those infected partners with HIV. Of those 25, 12 people remain in prison, four are on parole, one is on probation and a trial for one person is pending.

Tami Haught, who became HIV-positive 19 years ago after being infected by her husband, said she supports McCoy’s proposal. Haught works with Community HIV/Hepatitis Advocates of Iowa, which helped draft McCoy’s bill. Haught’s husband became infected through a blood transfusion in the 1980s and died of AIDS in 1996. They married after he was infected. “It takes two people to talk about protection and disclosure. I never had the discussion with my fiance,” she said. “That’s why I hate this law because it puts the entire burden on the HIV person.”