US: Bill to remove HIV reference from Pennsylvania criminal law moves forward

HB632 Passed out of Committee!

The AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania is proud to announce that a bill addressing HIV stigma has cleared the first hurdle to becoming law. Today the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee voted HB632 out of committee, moving it toward a full House vote, a Senate vote on companion bill SB647, and the Governor’s signature.

Along with coalition partners including PA HIV Justice Alliance, Positive Women’s Network, Girl U Can Do It Inc., Philadelphia FIGHT, Sero Project, and the Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation, we are grateful to Rep. Ben Waxman for his vision to protect people living with HIV from stigma.

With thanks to Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta and Rep. Emily Kinkead for comments in support.

Pennsylvania is one of nine states that still punish people charged with prostitution more harshly if living with HIV. If the buyer, seller, or promoter has HIV, the prostitution charge is a felony, not a misdemeanor.

Pennsylvania’s HIV-related felony enhancement was enacted in 1995 and has never served an effective law-enforcement purpose. In more than 30 years since its enactment, it has rarely been charged, and no credible research links harsher penalties with a reduction in HIV transmission.

It is time for that to change by removing a relic that only stigmatizes people living with HIV and does nothing to protect public health.

We also appreciate the committee’s vote in support of HR393, designating Feb. 28, 2026  as “HIV is Not a Crime Awareness Day.”


It’s long past time to remove the only remaining reference to HIV in the Pennsylvania criminal code.

Pennsylvania is one of nine states that still punish people charged with prostitution more harshly if living with HIV. Prostitution is a misdemeanor in Pennsylvania, but if the buyer, seller, or promoter has HIV, they may be charged with a felony enhancement.

Misdemeanors carry lighter penalties, like fines, probation, or short jail time. Felonies are punished by longer prison sentences, fines, and other consequences like loss of voting rights or difficulty finding employment.

Pennsylvania’s HIV-related felony enhancement was enacted in 1995 and has never served an effective law enforcement purpose. In the 30 years since its enactment, it’s rarely been charged, and no credible research links harsher penalties with a reduction in HIV transmission.

Modernizing HIV laws is a popular bipartisan issue. Recent polling reveals that 88% of Pennsylvanians believe that people living with HIV should receive the health and treatment they need, rather than face criminal charges.

HB632 would remove the last reference to HIV in the criminal code.

Click here to sign on, support HB632, end HIV stigma.


Current Pennsylvania legislation

On February 20, 2025, Representative Waxman introduced HB632, and it was referred to the House Judiciary Committee. A Judiciary Committee hearing was convened on June 2, 2025. See below for more on the hearing.

On April 21, 2025, Senator Hughes introduced a companion bill SB647 and it was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. No further action has yet been taken on SB647.

These bills would remove the last reference to HIV in the criminal code and reduce the stigma fueling the HIV epidemic.

Join us for a Lunch & Learn on HB632 in Harrisburg on March 24, 2026. Click here for more Information.


How You Can Help

  • Join us for a Lunch & Learn on HB632 in Harrisburg on March 24, 2026
  • Sign on, support HB632, end stigma
  • Call your state representatives and share these talking points:
    • Prostitution is a misdemeanor in Pennsylvania and most states — yet Pennsylvania is one of nine states that still punish people living with HIV more harshly than others charged with prostitution.
    • Pennsylvania’s felony enhancement was enacted in 1995 and has never served an effective law enforcement purpose. In the 30 years since its enactment, it’s rarely been charged, and no credible research links harsher penalties for prostitution with a reduction in HIV transmission.
    • Over time, the Pennsylvania legislature, like that of most other states, has modernized its criminal code by removing stigmatizing references to HIV. This modernization follows guidance from the American Medical Association, the American Bar Association, and other professional organizations, based on the facts of how HIV is transmitted.
    • Recent polling reveals that 88% of Pennsylvanians believe that people living with HIV should receive the health and treatment they need, rather than face criminal charges.
    • Only one reference to HIV in the Pennsylvania criminal code remains, and HB632 would remove it.
    • Pennsylvania has laws to punish those who harm others. Punishing people solely because they are living with HIV reinforces stigma, discourages people from getting tested and treated, and fuels the epidemic.

History

The journey to remove the final reference to HIV in the Pennsylvania Criminal Code began in community conversations and evolved to the Pennsylvania legislature when in 2024, Senator Vincent Hughes and Representatives Ben Waxman and Malcolm Kenyatta introduced Senate and House bills respectively.

The bills were referred to the respective judiciary committee, but didn’t make it to a hearing before the session ended. The legislature recessed sine die, and bills that did not pass died.

Representative Waxman reintroduced the House bill, now HB632 on February 20, 2025 and Senator Hughes reintroduced a companion bill, now  SB647 that was referred to the House Judiciary Committee. A Judiciary Committee hearing was convened on June 2, 2025. Testifiers (Andrea Johnson, Dr. Jay Kostman, Sean Strub, and Ronda Goldfein) spoke before the PA House Judiciary Committee on June 2, 2025 in support of HB632. You can watch a recording of the hearing here.

Benin: UNAIDS welcomes Benin’s new, pioneering HIV legislation

Benin adopts positive new law on HIV prevention, care and elimination of stigma and discrimination

UNAIDS welcomes the passing into law by the President of Benin Patrice Talon of Law 2026-02 on 9 February 2026. The law focuses on HIV prevention and management of care and will accelerate progress towards ending AIDS in the Republic of Benin.

The new law is the culmination of a process first initiated in 2013 and which resumed in 2020 under the leadership of the Health Program for the Fight against AIDS (PSLS). This revision was made due to the significant limitations of the 2006 law, namely that it was based on a punitive, coercive and stigmatizing approach.

The previous law was incompatible with human rights standards, allowed for numerous violations of confidentiality, criminalized HIV-related behaviors and reinforced the marginalization of key populations. The law was out of step with good public health practices which should be based on prevention, inclusion and respect for human rights.

The 2026 law is now aligned with international human rights standards and more specifically reaffirms the right to non-stigma and non-discrimination. It enhances privacy and data protection, ensures access to HIV care and prevention and services and recognizes key populations including sex workers, men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, transgender people, migrants and prisoners among others. It improves prisoners’ rights significantly and reduces criminal provisions against people living with HIV by recognizing the strictly voluntary nature of disclosing HIV status.

“The journey to validating Benin’s HIV Law was powered by strong country leadership, exceptional UNAIDS–UNDP collaboration, unwavering support from the UN Regional Coordinator, close technical follow-up with the Ministry of Health, catalytic funding from UNAIDS, UNDP and Expertise France, and close involvement of parliamentarians — turning evidence into political will and political will into transformative legislation’’ said Yayé Diallo, outgoing UNAIDS Country Director for Togo and Benin.

The progress is the result of coordinated advocacy and collaborative partnership actions at all levels involving the UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima, who made it a priority of her visit to Benin in September 2024.

UNAIDS Regional Office, the global HIV Legal Network and UNDP provided technical support. The Global Fund and Expertise France provided financial support and the combination of the efforts of various stakeholders at the local level, namely the PSLS, the CNLS-TP(Conseil National de Lutte contre le VIH/Sida, la Tuberculose, le Paludisme, les Hépatites, les Infections Sexuellement Transmissibles et les Épidémie), the parliament and its institutions (IPaB – Institut Parlementaire du Bénin), the caucus of women parliamentarians and parliamentary committees), civil society organizations including networks of people living with HIV and key populations. With this new law and rigorous monitoring of its application, Benin is resolutely committed to its march towards the ending AIDS by 2030.

“UNAIDS, the UN Country Team, and partners including Expertise France applaud Benin’s political resolve and its new, pioneering HIV legislation. By centering the law on vulnerable groups and youth who account for 35% of new infections, Benin is taking a giant leap towards universal access to HIV treatment and the ultimate goal of ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030.” said Christian Mouala, Representative and Director of the UNAIDS Multi-Country Office for Côte d’Ivoire, Togo, and Benin.

New Zealand: Undetectable yet prosecutable, study highlights the need for law reform

Momentum for change on HIV criminalisation

A study of people living with HIV has revealed that despite advances in HIV treatment, criminalisation continues to create uncertainty and distress, with 60% of people living with HIV fearing legal consequences and many avoiding relationships altogether.

The full study and its findings will be released at a public event on 27 February at 3 pm at the Ellen Melville Centre in Auckland, by Positive Women, Body Positive, Toitū te Ao and Burnett Foundation Aotearoa.

The study surveying 247 people living with HIV in New Zealand, highlights the urgent need for rules and practice to align with modern HIV science. Over half of participants reported anxiety about legal consequences, particularly around disclosing HIV or discussing sexual practices with healthcare service providers.

“This shows that people living with HIV want to see HIV transmission managed by Public Health authorities, and not the Police. We have one of the highest rates of HIV criminalisation per capita globally, with at least 14 prosecutions since 1993,” says Liz Gibbs CEO of Burnett Foundation Aotearoa.

“The Government’s decision to sign the U=U Call to Action at Big Gay Out 2026 is a great first step in bringing New Zealand into line with overseas best practices on how to manage HIV.”

U = U stands for Undetectable = Untransmittable (U=U). It means that a person living with HIV who is on effective treatment and maintains an undetectable viral load cannot transmit HIV to sexual partner(s).

“Currently people living with HIV may face prosecution under the Crimes Act for HIV non-disclosure to their sexual partners (unless they are using a condom), even if they are on treatment with an undetectable viral load and therefore pose zero risk of transmission,” says Gibbs.

New Zealand: Government backs U=U, opening door to reform of HIV non-disclosure laws

Burnett Foundation Aotearoa welcomes the Government’s decision on U=U

Associate Health Minister Doocey’s decision to sign the U=U declaration today is a critical step on the road towards zero locally acquired HIV transmissions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

U = U stands for Undetectable = Untransmittable (U=U). It means that a person living with HIV who is on effective treatment and maintains an undetectable viral load cannot transmit HIV to sexual partner(s).

“The U=U message helps increase testing, treatment adherence, and viral suppression rates, but most importantly, it increases the confidence and dignity of people living with HIV. It’s proof that science and compassion walk hand in hand,” says Liz Gibbs, CEO of Burnett Foundation Aotearoa.

This decision makes New Zealand the 5th country to sign the multinational U=U Call to Action, behind Australia, Canada, the USA, and Vietnam.

“Currently people living with HIV may face prosecution under the Crimes Act for HIV non-disclosure to their sexual partners (unless they are using a condom), even if they are on treatment with an undetectable viral load and therefore pose zero risk of transmission. With the Government’s official endorsement of U=U, it gives the Police, Courts and government departments the backing required to modernise outdated guidelines and policies, so they are in-keeping with the latest science.” says Gibbs.

This is a significant step forward that many across the HIV and sexual health community have been advocating for several years, and we are thrilled to see it finally come to pass.

 

Mexico: Colima Congress calls on federal lawmakers to repeal “danger of contagion” crime

Congress urges to eliminate the crime of “danger of contagion” from the Federal Criminal Code

Translated with AI. Scroll down for original article in Spanish

The State Congress approved by a majority a point of agreement to urge the Federal Chamber of Deputies to repeal the crime of “danger of contagion” of the Federal Criminal Code, considering it a discriminatory, stigmatizing legal figure and contrary to the human right to health.

The proposal was presented in the forum by Deputy Alfredo Álvarez, who argued that this type of crime, originally incorporated in 1949 and expanded in 1991, criminalizes the health condition of people, particularly those living with HIV, without the need to prove real damage or the effective transmission of a disease.

During his speech, the legislator pointed out that this figure violates fundamental principles such as equality before the law, proportionality and non-discrimination, in addition to promoting social stigma and generating barriers to access to health services.

The approved exhortation is based on the position of various national and international organizations, including UNAIDS, which has warned that the criminalization of HIV does not prevent contagion and, on the contrary, discourages diagnosis and timely treatment; as well as the Ministry of Health, which has pointed out that this crime revictimizes people living with HIV.

Pronouncements of Conapred, the National Commission on Human Rights (CNDH) and COPRED are also cited, which agree that the crime of danger of contagion has a stigmatizing character and must be eliminated to guarantee a public health policy based on human rights and scientific evidence.

Álvarez Ramírez recalled that entities such as Mexico City, Colima, Nayarit, San Luis Potosí, Aguascalientes and Baja California have already repealed or do not contemplate that crime in their criminal codes. He also stressed that on February 18, 2025, the Justice Committee of the Chamber of Deputies approved an opinion to eliminate this figure from the federal level.

With this agreement, the Colimense Congress specifically urges to reform articles 60 and 315, as well as to repeal Article 199 Bis of the Federal Criminal Code, moving towards a legal framework that protects health without criminalizing or stigmatizing.

“Legislating from the human rights implies abandoning punishment as a health policy and building laws based on scientific evidence and human dignity,” said Deputy Alfredo Álvarez at the end of his speech.


Exhorta Congreso a eliminar delito de “peligro de contagio” del Código Penal Federal

El Congreso del Estado aprobó por mayoría un punto de acuerdo para exhortar a la Cámara de Diputados federal a derogar el delito de “peligro de contagio” del Código Penal Federal, al considerarlo una figura jurídica discriminatoria, estigmatizante y contraria al derecho humano a la salud.

La propuesta fue presentada en tribuna por el diputado Alfredo Álvarez, quien argumentó que ese tipo de delito, incorporado originalmente en 1949 y ampliado en 1991, criminaliza la condición de salud de las personas, particularmente de quienes viven con VIH, sin que sea necesario demostrar un daño real o la transmisión efectiva de una enfermedad.

Durante su intervención, el legislador señaló que esa figura vulnera principios fundamentales como la igualdad ante la ley, la proporcionalidad y la no discriminación, además de fomentar el estigma social y generar barreras para el acceso a servicios de salud.

El exhorto aprobado se sustenta en la postura de diversos organismos nacionales e internacionales, entre ellos ONUSida, que ha advertido que la criminalización del VIH no previene contagios y, por el contrario, desincentiva el diagnóstico y el tratamiento oportuno; así como la Secretaría de Salud, que ha señalado que ese delito revictimiza a las personas que viven con VIH.

También se citan pronunciamientos de la Conapred, la Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos (CNDH) y COPRED, los cuales coinciden en que el delito de peligro de contagio tiene un carácter estigmatizante y debe ser eliminado para garantizar una política de salud pública basada en derechos humanos y evidencia científica.

Álvarez Ramírez recordó que entidades como Ciudad de México, Colima, Nayarit, San Luis Potosí, Aguascalientes y Baja California ya han derogado o no contemplan ese delito en sus códigos penales. Asimismo, destacó que el 18 de febrero de 2025, la Comisión de Justicia de la Cámara de Diputados aprobó un dictamen para eliminar esta figura del ámbito federal.

Con ese acuerdo, el Congreso colimense exhorta específicamente a reformar los artículos 60 y 315, así como a derogar el Artículo 199 Bis del Código Penal Federal, avanzando hacia un marco jurídico que proteja la salud sin criminalizar ni estigmatizar.

“Legislar desde los derechos humanos implica abandonar el castigo como política de salud y construir leyes basadas en evidencia científica y dignidad humana”, expresó el diputado Alfredo Álvarez al cierre de su intervención.

New Zealand: New Zealand’s HIV progress undermined by stigma and outdated laws

Experts warn stigma, outdated laws obstacles to ending HIV transmission

New Zealand is on track to record its lowest number of new HIV diagnoses in decades – but advocates say progress is at risk because stigma and outdated laws still shape the lives of people living with HIV.

Just 95 people were diagnosed with HIV in 2024, with even fewer expected this year. But, despite the medical advances behind that decline, discrimination remains widespread.

Judith Mukakayange from Positive Women Inc said she still sees stigma harming families.

“I got a call about a family denied emergency housing because the mother is living with HIV. They believed she could transmit HIV just by sharing a house, which is not true.”

Burnett Foundation Aotearoa CEO Liz Gibbs said outdated criminal laws also contributed to the stigma.

“If you don’t declare your status and have unprotected sex, you can be criminally prosecuted under New Zealand law, despite being on treatment and having an undetectable viral load. They cannot transmit HIV, and therefore shouldn’t be criminalised.”

Rodrigo Olin German, who has lived with HIV for 22 years, said too few New Zealanders understood the science behind modern treatment.

“Very few people know that people with HIV cannot pass it on if they are on effective treatment. We need more education and wider national campaigns.”

A history of acceptance – a present-day problem

New Zealand once prided itself on its compassion toward people living with HIV. In the 1980s, Eve van Grafhorst, a young girl ostracised in Australia after contracting HIV through a blood transfusion, was welcomed in Aotearoa and able to live a normal life.

Advocates say that spirit has faded, and that public attitudes today are still shaped by fear rather than science.

Survey reveals widespread misunderstanding

New research released ahead World AIDS Day highlights the scale of the problem:

  • 41% of New Zealanders are not comfortable having food prepared by someone living with HIV
  • 82% say they would be uncomfortable having a sexual relationship with someone with HIV
  • 23% would be uncomfortable shaking hands.

Calls for law reform and access to medication

At a World AIDS Day breakfast at Parliament, the Burnett Foundation called on the Government to update HIV criminalisation laws and improve access to modern medicines.

Gibbs said New Zealand was significantly behind other countries.

“Some of our medication regime is 15 years or longer behind best practice in OECD nations. In other countries, you would have access to long-acting injectable treatment.”

Government response

The Government says there are no current plans to review HIV criminalisation laws.

However, officials have been asked to provide advice on endorsing the U=U campaign, which highlightedthat HIV can be both undetectable and untransmittable with the right treatment.

Advocates say embracing U=U publicly, updating the law and improving medication access could put New Zealand on track to become one of the first countries in the world to reach zero new transmissions.

Canada: Advocates urge Liberals to honour the Trudeau government’s commitment to reform HIV disclosure laws

Words aren’t enough: Canada must deliver on HIV criminal reform

HIV criminalization is not a new concern. For decades, people living with HIV in Canada have faced the reality that they can still face public outing by authorities, prosecution by the “justice” system, and imprisonment for allegedly not disclosing their HIV status to a sexual partner. This continues to be the case today, even in situations where there was no realistic possibility of transmission, no intent to transmit, and no transmission actually happened.

And for decades, people living with HIV, activists and community advocates, legal minds, and public health and medical experts have shown again and again that Canada’s terribly punitive approach is discriminatory, scientifically outdated, and harmful to public health. It reinforces and codifies systemic injustices and inequalities based on race, migration status, sexual orientation, and gender. It contradicts current science on HIV transmission, and it entrenches HIV stigma, further cementing barriers that people living with HIV face to accessing care and treatment, not to mention housing, employment, and personal safety. How can we expect people to feel safe getting tested and learning their HIV status when it could later be vindictively used against them?

That’s why it really mattered when, on December 1st, 2017, the Government of Canada acknowledged these very concerns and highlighted the problematic state of HIV criminalization on World AIDS Day in their report Criminal Justice System’s Response to Non-Disclosure of HIV. The problem is that since 2017, the government’s actions have not caught up to words and there has been little progress from Canada to right these wrongs. People living with HIV in this country continue to be forced to live in fear.

Over the last eight years, activists, led by people living with HIV themselves, have continued to move the needle on HIV criminalization. Thanks to their efforts, the federal government announced national consultations on HIV criminalization at the 2022 International AIDS Conference, which was held in Montreal. “Our government recognizes that the criminalization of people living with HIV can lead to stigmatization and significant hardships,” stated then-Minister of Justice David Lametti. “This is why we are consulting Canadians on the best approach to reform the criminal law regarding HIV non-disclosure. It will help us find solutions, and will lead to better outcomes for affected populations.”

Those consultations concluded in early 2023 and since that time, no law reform has been introduced. Productive meetings with advocates aimed at making meaningful change continued for a time, until the Government of Canada quietly informed us last year that it had put any plans for real justice on the backburner.

While other jurisdictions, including various American states, such as Nevada, Virginia, Maryland, and Illinois, narrow or eliminate misguided prosecutions, the threat of criminalization continues to hang over the heads of people living with HIV here in Canada. In parallel, at a time when fewer people are being diagnosed with HIV around the world, HIV cases rose a staggering 35.2% in Canada between 2022 and 2023. While preliminary data from 2024 indicate a slight decrease in new cases in Canada, only time will tell whether this represents a reversal from recent worrying trends. What remains clear is that Canada must do more – both in its legal and policy responses – to get back on track toward the goal of eliminating HIV as a public health threat by 2030.

And so, every World AIDS Day, advocates find themselves writing yet another op-ed urging Canada to act. The headlines over the past few years alone tell the story: “Unjust HIV Criminalization is a National Disgrace”; “The Government of Canada Must Act to End the Harms of HIV Criminalization”; “We Need to Stop Criminalizing People with HIV”; “Let’s Stop Criminalizing HIV Status.” How long until these headlines are finally replaced with news that Canada has followed through on its promises to end the harms of HIV criminalization?

With a new government in place, we are feeling more hopeful than we were last World AIDS Day. But this government still needs to take firm and decisive action to bring Canada’s laws in line with science and human rights, and remove the stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV that is currently entrenched in our justice system. In so doing, we could envision a very different headline for next year’s World AIDS Day op-ed, and a very different reality for people living with HIV in Canada.

Muluba Habanyama is the Chair of the Canadian Coalition to Reform HIV Criminalization

Colin Hastings is an Assistant Professor at the University of Waterloo

André Capretti is a Policy Analyst at the HIV Legal Network

Mexico: Baja California eliminates HIV Criminalisation from State Criminal Code

BC Congress eliminates crime of “danger of contagion”

Translated with Google Translate. Scroll down for article in Spanish.

Mexicali, Baja California.- The XXV Legislature of the Congress of Baja California approved the repeal of article 160 of the state Criminal Code, which considered the “danger of contagion” of communicable diseases a crime. The measure seeks to eliminate the criminalization of people with sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV/AIDS, and reduce the stigma that hinders their access to prevention, diagnosis and treatment services.

The opinion, presented by the Diversity Committee and supported by deputies Liliana Michel Sánchez Allende and Jaime Eduardo Cantón Rocha, maintains that the criminal figure was ambiguous and contrary to the principle of minimal criminal intervention, in addition to being redundant compared to other legal provisions that protect health.

The legal analysis of the Congress pointed out that the repeal is in line with articles 1 and 40 of the Federal Constitution, with jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation and with international standards, including the guidelines of UNAIDS and the American Convention on Human Rights.

Deputy Cantón Rocha explained that the elimination of article 160 represents an act of progressiveness in the protection of human rights and a step to ensure that no person is criminally sanctioned for carrying a disease. “No one deserves to go to jail for having a disease,” he said.

The repeal of article 160 places Baja California in the line of other entities such as Mexico City, Nuevo León and Nayarit, which have already eliminated similar provisions and promote a preventive and non-punitive approach to public health.


Congreso BC elimina delito de “peligro de contagio”

Mexicali, Baja California.- La XXV Legislatura del Congreso de Baja California aprobó la derogación del artículo 160 del Código Penal estatal, que consideraba delito el “peligro de contagio” de enfermedades transmisibles. La medida busca eliminar la criminalización de personas con infeccionesde transmisión sexual (ITS), incluyendo VIH/SIDA, y reducir el estigma que obstaculiza su acceso a servicios de prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento.

El dictamen, presentado por la Comisión de la Diversidad y respaldado por las diputadas Liliana Michel Sánchez Allende y Jaime Eduardo Cantón Rocha, sostiene que la figura penal era ambigua y contraria al principio de mínima intervención penal, además de redundante frente a otras disposiciones legales que protegen la salud.

El análisis jurídico del Congreso señaló que la derogación se alinea con los artículos 1 y 40 de la Constitución federal, con jurisprudencia de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación y con estándares internacionales, incluidos los lineamientos de ONUSIDA y la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos.

El diputado Cantón Rocha explicó que la eliminación del artículo 160 representa un acto de progresividad en la protección de los derechos humanosy un paso para garantizar que ninguna persona sea sancionada penalmente por portar una enfermedad. “Nadie se merece ir a la cárcel por tener una enfermedad”, afirmó.

La derogación del artículo 160 coloca a Baja California en la línea de otras entidades como Ciudad de México, Nuevo León y Nayarit, que ya han eliminado disposiciones similares y promueve un enfoque preventivo y no punitivo en salud pública.

Canada: Reform of HIV criminalisation laws remains stalled amid political delays

Advocates against HIV criminalization decry Carney silence on reform Trudeau promised

OTTAWA — HIV activists say there is mounting frustration in communities affected by the virus, amid near-silence from the federal government nearly 10 years after the Liberals pledged to reform laws surrounding HIV disclosure.

“We’re coming up on a decade,” said Muluba Habanyama, head of the Canadian Coalition to Reform HIV Criminalization. “There definitely has been some exhaustion.”

Canadians living with HIV can be prosecuted for not disclosing their status to sexual partners, even when they are taking prescription drugs that the Public Health Agency of Canada says renders HIV “untransmittable” to someone without the virus.

The HIV Legal Network says more than 220 people have been charged in Canada for allegedly not disclosing their HIV status since 1989.

The Liberals have been promising to fix the issue since 2016, and issued advice to prosecutors in 2018 meant to prevent them from laying criminal charges when there is no realistic possibility of transmission.

Still, HIV service organizations in Habanyama’s coalition encounter situations every few months, such as someone being arrested when an aggrieved ex-partner claims they were exposed to the virus.

A prosecution under sexual assault can put them on the National Sex Offender Registry.

“We are demonized,” said Habanyama, who has had HIV since birth.

She has watched for 32 years as medical experts developed increasingly effective tools to treat and prevent the virus.

“I’ve literally grown up with the science, but then seeing the law be exactly the same,” she said.

Even if people aren’t being criminally charged for non-disclosure, the experience of police questioning someone or taking them into custody sends a message to others who suspect they have HIV that they might be better off not getting a test.

“People are like ‘well, I don’t know my status; I can’t get charged,’” Habanyama said. “If they don’t have a record of you getting tested, you can’t prove that you knew.”

The Department of Justice acknowledged the issue in an October 2022 notice, when it launched consultations for legal reforms, six years after the Liberals first pledged action on the issue.

“Criminalization can lead to the stigmatization of people living with HIV, which can often discourage individuals from being tested or seeking treatment,” the department wrote at the time.

Other countries have reformed their laws, in recognition that the threat of prosecution prevents reaching global public-health targets of having 95 per cent of people who have HIV aware of their status and on medication.

Only 89 per cent of people with HIV in Canada know their status, according to 2022 data.

A 2022 study of 600 Canadian women living with HIV found one-fifth faced more verbal, physical or sexual violence because of HIV criminalization, such as a man who rapes a woman and threatens to report they’ve been exposed to HIV if the woman files assault charges.

“This is really affecting the lives of people living with HIV, and stops them from taking care of themselves,” Habanyama said.

The Liberals have pledged to table legislation, but put froze those plans last fall, blaming Conservative filibustering for a logjam in Parliament. The government then prorogued Parliament and went into an election, followed by a brief spring sitting.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government has given no indication if it will table legislation.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser was not available for an interview despite repeated requests from The Canadian Press over several weeks. He has also not agreed to meet with the coalition, instead offering a meeting with his staff members.

“Our work is ongoing and we are engaging with stakeholders at this time,” wrote Lola Dandybaeva, a spokeswoman for Fraser.

André Capretti, a policy analyst with the HIV Legal Network, said it has been “mostly radio silence” since Carney took office, though he said it’s possible the government is still getting its business in order through the summer break.

“We were making a lot of progress with the Liberal government, who was very much committed to reform on this issue and showed real commitment to engaging us,” he said, noting Justin Trudeau’s justice ministers seemed attentive.

Still, there is inconsistent enforcement across provinces, with some largely ignoring Ottawa’s 2018 advice to prosecutors, which is only binding in the territories.

“We still know of cases in the past year, of prosecutions having been initiated against people living with HIV for non-disclosure,” Capretti said.

“There is definitely frustration that has built up, just based on how long this has been ongoing and the number of repeated commitments … from different justice ministers.”

Habanyama said Canada needs a rethink in how it legislates and thinks about HIV.

She recalls her Catholic elementary school in Oakville, Ont. teaching her in the mid-2000s that HIV meant death and was the result of reckless sex, with no mention that people like her contracted it in the womb or from their mother’s breast milk.

“I was raised (to understand) this is a shameful secret that we can’t tell anybody, that this is a really bad thing.”

When she visits schools to talk about HIV, she asks students what someone with HIV looks like, and the students often say they’d expect someone bald with scars on their body. They’re often surprised when she tells them she has HIV.

The threat of criminalization looms large among Black women and gay men. Multiple woman with roots in the Caribbean who live with HIV have told Habanyama to preserve evidence in case a sexual partner ever accuses her of exposing them to HIV — including their DNA.

“These groups of women were telling me that when I have sex, I should put the man’s condom in the freezer so that I have proof if the police ever come, that we used protection.”

She said Canadians should ask their politicians to do more, particularly when they show up at events like this weekend’s Pride parade in Ottawa.

“HIV can happen to anybody,” Habanyama said. “We are all supposed to be in this together.”

 

US: Missouri prison system ends solitary confinement policy targeting people with HIV

A Woman With HIV Spent Six Years in Solitary. She Sued and Missouri Will Change Its Policy.

Honesty Bishop was attacked by her cellmate. Prison officials deemed her sexually active and kept her in isolation for more than 2,000 days.

Honesty Bishop could hear the screams of other people in solitary confinement. Sometimes it was so cold in her cell, she could see her breath. She dealt with scabies and mold. Her days and nights were spent in extreme isolation.

The Missouri Department of Corrections kept her locked in a cell about the size of a parking space for over six years.

She wrote letters to her sister, Latasha Monroe, in St. Louis. They both wondered why Bishop continued to be held in such severe conditions at Jefferson City Correctional Center, a men’s facility.

Interviews and records on Bishop’s years in solitary confinement paint a dark picture of a person who felt alone and hopeless, and, in the depths of despair, was driven to self-harm.

Bishop, a transgender woman, initially landed there after her cellmate tried to sexually assault her in spring 2015.

She was HIV-positive and because of the assault was classified as “sexually active” — even though she was the victim and had been on medication, making the virus undetectable and therefore untransmissible, according to a federal lawsuit filed against the Missouri Department of Corrections.

Among the reasons people can be kept in isolation, according to the department’s policy, are murder, rape and being sexually active with HIV. In her suit, Bishop said corrections officials kept her in solitary confinement because of her HIV status.

Whenever she appeared before a committee that reviewed her placement in solitary, which generally took place every 30 or 90 days, corrections officials noted 15 times when Bishop had no violations since the previous review.

“I’ve been good,” she told them during a hearing on her solitary confinement in January 2016, and again that September.

Though she filed grievances about how long she had been kept in solitary, her pleas were ignored. Department of Corrections officials wouldn’t release her from the unit until 2021 — after more than 2,000 days.

Missouri is one of three states that singles out people with HIV when it comes to solitary confinement, according to a review of 49 states’ policies on administrative segregation and restrictive housing.

The department’s HIV policy will now be changed under the terms of an Aug. 20 settlement that resulted from the lawsuit.

The state agreed to remove language singling out people with HIV for segregation. The terms also include conducting an assessment of anyone with HIV who is sent to solitary and mandatory training for some prison staff.

The department would not comment specifically on the policy or the lawsuit. Karen Pojmann, a spokeswoman for the agency, said a committee is in the process of overhauling restrictive housing. Two prisons are piloting a new model that includes “meaningful hearings” and programming to help people reenter the general population in prison, she said.

Bishop did not live to see the policy change — she died by suicide on Aug. 13, 2024. She was 34.