South Africa does not have an HIV-specific criminal law due to advocates actively engaging in law reform processes to preclude the introduction of such laws, despite a number of attempts to do so.
In 2001, the South African Law Commission undertook a comprehensive review of the need for an HIV-specific criminal law, concluding that an HIV-specific law would “have no or little practical utility; the social costs entailed in creating an HIV-specific statutory offence/s are not justified; and an HIV-specific statutory offence/s [would] infringe the right to privacy to an extent that is not justified.”
A 2003 Criminal Law Amendment Bill sought to define non-disclosure of HIV status prior to otherwise consensual sex as rape, but that definition was not included in the version of the bill that was approved in 2007. Instead, South African law can require HIV-antibody testing for suspected sex offenders and, where the accused is found to be HIV-positive, that can be used to increase the sentences of the offender.
The four HIV criminalisation cases known to have proceeded prior to 2020 related to sexual assault; involving the upgrading of sexual assault charges to include attempted murder based on a perceived risk of HIV transmission, rather than actual transmission or intention to transmit HIV.
In the first known case (2008), an HIV-positive man was charged with rape and attempted murder after raping his son. The attempted murder charge related to the risk of his son contracting HIV.
In 2013, an HIV-positive man was convicted of attempted murder for having sex with a woman without using a condom: he said he had used a condom both times they had sex, while she said that he hadn’t. The judge found that it did not need to be proven that he had transmitted HIV to her because having sex without using a condom was enough to satisfy an attempted murder conviction. The case was appealed and the conviction was upheld.
In 2014, an HIV-positive teacher was charged with rape and attempted murder after allegedly raping a student. The attempted murder charge related to a perceived risk of HIV transmission.
In 2015, an HIV-positive man was charged with rape and attempted murder after he raped his former girlfriend. The assault occurred after she found a packet of antiretroviral drugs and confronted him about having HIV. Information about the case is limited, although media reports do not allege transmission: the attempted murder charge appears to have been related to a perceived risk of HIV transmission.
2020 marks the first known instance of a person being prosecuted for alleged HIV transmission as a stand-alone offence. In September 2020, the former armed forces officer was charged with attempted murder (with an alternate charge of rape under false pretences) after allegedly ‘intentionally’ transmitting HIV to a fellow member of the armed forces. The circumstances relate to an ongoing consensual sexual relationship, with the prosecution alleging the accused did not disclose his HIV-positive status and insisted on condomless sex. Despite the use of terms such as ‘intentionally’ and ‘attempted murder’, HJN has been unable to identify evidence suggesting that the man wanted to transmit HIV or harm the woman. Defence arguments are not yet available. The case will be heard in January 2021.
Sexual Offences Amendment Act, 2007
Services for victims relating to Post Exposure Prophylaxis and compulsory HIV testing of alleged sex offenders
28. (1) If a victim has been exposed to the risk of being infected with HIV as the result of a sexual offence having been committed against him or her, he or she may—
(b) subject to section 30, apply to a magistrate for an order that the alleged offender be tested for HIV, at State expense.
Application by victim or interested person for HIV testing of alleged sex offender
30. (I) (a) Within 90 days after the alleged commission of a sexual offence any victim or any interested person on behalf of a victim, may apply to a magistrate, in the prescribed form, for an order that—
(i) the alleged offender be tested for HIV and that the results thereof be disclosed to the victim or interested person, as the case may be, and to the alleged offender; or
(ii) the HIV test results in respect of the alleged offender, obtained on application by a police official as contemplated in section 32, be disclosed to the victim or interested person, as the case may be
Use of results of HIV tests
34. The results of an HIV test, performed in terms of an order contemplated in sections 31(3) and 32(3), may only be used in the following circumstances:
(a) to inform a victim or an interested person whether or not the alleged offender in the case in question is infected with HIV with the view to
(i) reducing secondary trauma and empowering the victim to make informed medical, lifestyle and other personal decisions; or
(ii) using the test results as evidence in any ensuing civil proceedings as a result of the sexual offence in question; or
(b) to enable an investigating officer to gather information with the view to using it as evidence in criminal proceedings
HIV criminalisation scan of South Africa by the National Association of People Living with HIV and AIDS ( NAPWA) for GNP+.
Presents findings from an enquiry undertaken at the request of the Parliamentary Justice Portfolio Committee following public pressure for ‘appropriate action’ regarding deliberate or knowing transmission of HIV infection. The report concludes that statutory intervention (HIV specific law) is neither necessary nor desirable.
Our thanks to UNAIDS for their research assistance to confirm current relevant legislation.